How do examiners assess the “amount of direction” provided in a patent specification?
Examiners assess the “amount of direction” provided in a patent specification as part of evaluating the enablement requirement. According to MPEP 2164.06:
“The specification need not contain an example if the invention is otherwise disclosed in such manner that one skilled in the art will be able to practice it without an undue amount of experimentation. In re Borkowski, 422 F.2d 904, 908, 164 USPQ 642, 645 (CCPA 1970).”
Key considerations for assessing the amount of direction:
- Clarity and detail of the disclosure
- Presence of working examples (helpful but not always necessary)
- Guidance on how to practice the invention
- Information on avoiding pitfalls or overcoming difficulties
- Relationship between the direction provided and the predictability in the art
Examiners evaluate whether the specification provides sufficient direction to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the invention without undue experimentation. The amount of direction required may vary depending on the complexity of the invention and the state of the art.
To learn more: