Can you provide an example of implicit disclosure in patent law?

Yes, the MPEP 2144.01 provides a clear example of implicit disclosure in the case of In re Lamberti. The MPEP states:

“Reference disclosure of a compound where the R-S-R’ portion has ‘at least one methylene group attached to the sulfur atom’ implies that the other R group attached to the sulfur atom can be other than methylene and therefore suggests asymmetric dialkyl moieties.”

In this case, although the reference didn’t explicitly state that the other R group could be different from methylene, it was reasonably inferred from the phrase “at least one methylene group.” This implication was considered as an implicit disclosure of asymmetric dialkyl moieties.

To learn more:

Topics: MPEP 2100 - Patentability, MPEP 2144.01 - Implicit Disclosure, Patent Law, Patent Procedure
Tags: Chemical Patents, Implicit Disclosure, In Re Lamberti, Patent Law Examples