Can both working and prophetic examples be used in the same patent application?
Yes, a patent application can include both working examples and prophetic examples. However, it’s crucial to clearly distinguish between the two types. The MPEP 2164.02 states:
“An example may be “working” or “prophetic.” A working example is based on work actually performed. A prophetic example describes an embodiment of the invention based on predicted results rather than work actually conducted or results actually achieved.”
When using both types of examples:
- Clearly label or indicate which examples are working and which are prophetic.
- Use appropriate tenses: past tense for working examples, present or future tense for prophetic examples.
- Ensure that the combination of examples adequately supports the enablement requirement for the claimed invention.
By properly distinguishing between working and prophetic examples, inventors can provide a comprehensive description of their invention while maintaining transparency about the status of their research and development.
To learn more:
Topics:
MPEP 2100 - Patentability,
MPEP 2164.02 - Working And Prophetic Examples,
Patent Law,
Patent Procedure