Are there any exceptions to the rule of two periods running simultaneously in patent applications?

Question

Accepted Answer

Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based) BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 3 Rules 5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Yes, there is an exception involving suggested claims. According to MPEP 710.04 : “For an exception involving suggested claims, see MPEP Chapter 2300.” This exception relates to interference proceedings, which are detailed in MPEP Chapter 2300. In such cases, the handling of suggested claims may affect the running periods differently than in standard examination scenarios. Related Rules from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure 3 rules Collapse Application Abandoned for Missing Prosecution Within Six Months MPEP 710 Required Director May Extend Time for Taking Action on Important Inventions MPEP 710 Permitted Technology Center Director Decides Time Extensions MPEP 710 Other Related FAQs 5 FAQs Collapse What happens when two different periods for reply are running against a patent application? How long do I have to respond to a notice about an unlocatable file? How does 37 CFR 1.136 affect time periods in patent applications? What is the &#8216;next succeeding business day&#8217; rule for patent application deadlines? When does the USPTO set time periods that are not subject to extensions?