What are the consequences of an inadequate description of a biological material deposit?

What are the consequences of an inadequate description of a biological material deposit? An inadequate description of a biological material deposit can have serious consequences for a patent application: Rejection of the application for lack of written description under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) Inability to demonstrate possession of the claimed invention Difficulty in enforcing the patent…

Read More

What are the consequences of failing to comply with the written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)?

What are the consequences of failing to comply with the written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)? Failing to comply with the written description requirement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) can result in the rejection of a patent application. The MPEP states: “A description that does not meet the written description requirement will result in a…

Read More

How does changing numeric range limits affect patent claim scope?

Changing numeric range limits can significantly affect patent claim scope. The MPEP 2163.05 provides guidance on this: “A claim that omits an element which applicant describes as an essential or critical feature of the invention originally disclosed does not comply with the written description requirement.” This principle applies to numeric ranges as well. Modifying range…

Read More

How does the USPTO determine if a claim in a later-filed application is entitled to the benefit of an earlier filing date?

The USPTO determines if a claim in a later-filed application is entitled to the benefit of an earlier filing date by evaluating whether: The subject matter of the claim is disclosed in the earlier-filed application. The disclosure in the earlier-filed application complies with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112(a), except for the best mode requirement.…

Read More