Can arguments of patent attorneys replace evidence in patent examination?
Can arguments of patent attorneys replace evidence in patent examination? No, the arguments of patent attorneys cannot replace actual evidence in patent examination. This principle is clearly stated in MPEP 716.01(c) II: The arguments of counsel cannot take the place of evidence in the record. In re Schulze, 346 F.2d 600, 602, 145 USPQ 716,…
Read MoreWhat is the impact of amendments after final rejection on appeal rights?
Amendments submitted after a final rejection do not automatically remove the application from its appeal-ready or potentially abandoned status. As stated in MPEP 714.12: The admission of, or refusal to admit, any amendment after a final rejection, a final action, an action closing prosecution, or any related proceedings will not operate to relieve the application…
Read MoreWhat are the options for amendments after final rejection?
After a final rejection, an applicant has several options for amendments: Cancel claims or comply with form requirements from a previous Office action Present rejected claims in better form for appeal consideration Submit amendments touching the merits of the application, if good and sufficient reasons are shown As stated in MPEP 714.12: Any amendment that…
Read MoreWhat are the conditions for withdrawal from accelerated examination?
What are the conditions for withdrawal from accelerated examination? An applicant can withdraw from the accelerated examination program at any time during the examination process. However, there are specific conditions and consequences to consider: The application will be removed from the accelerated examination program and placed on the examiner’s regular docket. The application will no…
Read MoreCan an express abandonment be withdrawn or revoked?
Generally, an express abandonment cannot be withdrawn or revoked once it has been recognized by the Office. The MPEP 711.01 states: “A letter of express abandonment which is personally delivered to the Office on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday within the District of Columbia, will be deemed to be received on the next succeeding…
Read MoreWho signs a Patentability Report in the USPTO examination process?
According to MPEP § 705, a Patentability Report (P.R.) is signed by a specific individual in the examination process. The MPEP states: This report is known as a Patentability Report (P.R.) and is signed by the primary examiner in the reporting TC. This means that the primary examiner in the Technology Center (TC) that is…
Read MoreWhen is a Patentability Report used in the patent examination process?
A Patentability Report is used in specific circumstances during the patent examination process. According to MPEP § 705, it’s used: When an application is properly assigned to one Technology Center (TC) The application contains one or more claims classifiable in one or more other TCs These claims are not divisible from each other or from…
Read MoreWhat is a shortened statutory period in patent examination?
A shortened statutory period is a time limit set by the USPTO for applicants to respond to Office actions. According to MPEP 710.02(b), Under the authority given him or her by 35 U.S.C. 133, the Director of the USPTO has directed the examiner to set a shortened period for reply to every action. This period…
Read MoreWhat is abandonment of a patent application?
Abandonment of a patent application refers to the removal of an application from the Office docket of pending applications. According to MPEP 711, abandonment can occur in two ways: Under 37 CFR 1.135, for failure to reply within the specified time period Under 37 CFR 1.138, through express abandonment It’s important to note that this…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO weigh objective evidence in patent examination?
The USPTO weighs objective evidence in patent examination by considering the entire record and balancing all evidence. As stated in MPEP 716.01(d): “The ultimate determination of patentability must be based on consideration of the entire record, by a preponderance of evidence, with due consideration to the persuasiveness of any arguments and any secondary evidence.” This…
Read More