How should examiners approach product-by-process claims?

Examiners should approach product-by-process claims by focusing on the product itself, rather than the process of making it. MPEP 904.01 provides guidance: Product-by-process claims are not limited to the manipulations of the recited steps, only the structure implied by the steps. Key points for examiners to consider: The patentability of a product does not depend…

Read More

What is the significance of an allowable linking claim in a transitional application?

An allowable linking claim in a transitional application has significant implications for the application process, as outlined in MPEP 803.03(a). The key significance is: “Whenever divided inventions in a transitional application are rejoined because a linking claim is allowable ( MPEP § 809 , § 821.04 , and § 821.04(a) ) …” This statement indicates…

Read More

What should applicants do if their pre-July 1, 2009 Article 19 Amendments were not entered correctly?

If an applicant’s pre-July 1, 2009 Article 19 Amendments were not entered correctly in the U.S. national stage application, the USPTO recommends submitting a preliminary amendment. According to MPEP 1893.01(a)(2): “In such situations, applicants are encouraged to submit a preliminary amendment in accordance with 37 CFR 1.121 to obtain entry of the desired changes.” This…

Read More

How can the public access reissue application files?

The public can access reissue application files through the USPTO’s Patent Center. MPEP 1430 states: “IFW reissue application files are open to inspection by the general public by way of Patent Center via the USPTO Internet site. In viewing the images of the files, members of the public will be able to view the entire…

Read More