How does the USPTO handle paper files in the interference process?
The USPTO has transitioned most application files to the Image File Wrapper (IFW) system, but some older files may still exist in paper form. The MPEP 2304.01(b) addresses this issue: “Although the official records for most applications have been converted into Image File Wrapper (IFW) files, some records exist only in paper form, particularly older…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle newly discovered prior art in inter partes reexamination when there’s concurrent litigation?
The USPTO’s handling of newly discovered prior art in inter partes reexamination with concurrent litigation is as follows: Estoppel under 35 U.S.C. 317(b) does not apply to newly discovered prior art unavailable during the litigation. The patent owner must show that the art was known to the requester at a time when it could have…
Read MoreCan a maintenance fee payment be applied to a different patent than originally intended?
Yes, in certain circumstances, the USPTO may attempt to apply a maintenance fee payment to a different patent than originally intended. This typically occurs when there’s an issue with the first payment and a duplicate payment is received. MPEP 2532 states: “If a review of the Office record of the first maintenance fee payment reveals…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle translation errors in foreign priority documents for international design applications?
The USPTO handles translation errors in foreign priority documents for international design applications as follows: If an error in the translation of a foreign priority document is discovered after publication of the international registration, the USPTO will generally not take action to correct the error. However, the applicant may submit a corrected translation for consideration…
Read MoreWhat happens if a third party submits a petition regarding patent term adjustment?
If a third party submits a petition or any document concerning patent term adjustment, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will not consider it. According to MPEP 2736: “Any such submission or petition will be returned to the third party, or otherwise disposed of, at the convenience of the Office.” This means that…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle protected or secret information in protests?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling protected or secret information submitted with protests. According to the MPEP: “Information which is subject to a court-imposed protective or secrecy order may be submitted with, or as a part of, a protest under 37 CFR 1.291. Trade secret information which was obtained by a protestor through agreements…
Read MoreHow are multiple post-patent proceedings handled by the USPTO?
When multiple post-patent proceedings are filed simultaneously, the USPTO handles them on a case-by-case basis. According to MPEP 2821: “If multiple post-patent proceedings are simultaneously filed, any determination of which proceedings to initiate, and the order in which to initiate them, will be made on a case-by-case basis.“ This approach allows the Office to consider…
Read MoreHow are merged reexamination proceedings handled by the USPTO?
When reexamination proceedings are merged, the USPTO follows specific guidelines to ensure efficient handling: A single combined examiner’s action is prepared for all merged proceedings. Each action contains the control numbers of all involved proceedings on every page. A single action cover mailing sheet is used for all parties involved. The patent owner is required…
Read MoreWhat happens to Sequence Listing XML files that exceed the 600KB limit?
While MPEP 2419.01 does not explicitly state what happens to Sequence Listing XML files that exceed the 600KB limit when transformed into ASCII text, it implies that these larger files are treated differently: “Upon transformation of the .xml file using the style sheet to an ASCII text file, any ASCII text file produced by the…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO handle applications not under secrecy orders that interfere with applications under secrecy orders?
The USPTO has a specific procedure for handling applications not under secrecy orders that interfere with applications under secrecy orders. According to MPEP 2306: “If an application not under a secrecy order has allowable claims that interfere with allowable claims of an application that is under a secrecy order, then the application that is not…
Read More