What’s the difference between withdrawing a patent term extension application and responding to an election requirement?

There’s a significant difference between withdrawing a patent term extension application and responding to an election requirement. The MPEP 2764 notes: “This is a different situation as compared to MPEP § 2761 where the withdrawal is in response to a requirement for election and not an express withdrawal under 37 CFR 1.770.” Key differences include:…

Read More

What options does a patent owner have after receiving an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP)?

After receiving an Action Closing Prosecution (ACP) in an inter partes reexamination, the patent owner has specific options as outlined in MPEP 2671.02: File written comments: “Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.951(a), the patent owner may once file written comments limited to the issues raised in the reexamination proceeding and/or present a proposed amendment to the…

Read More

How are issues outside the scope of reexamination handled in inter partes proceedings?

In inter partes reexamination proceedings, issues that fall outside the scope of reexamination are noted but not considered. According to MPEP 2671.01: “If questions not within the scope of reexamination proceedings (for example, questions of patentability based on public use or on sale, conduct issues, abandonment under 35 U.S.C. 102) have been newly raised by…

Read More

What is the role of the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) in ex parte reexamination?

The Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP) plays a crucial role in the initial stages of ex parte reexamination. According to MPEP 2226: “The opening of all mail marked “Mail Stop Ex Parte Reexam,” and all initial clerical processing of requests for reexamination, will be performed in the Office of Patent Application Processing (OPAP).” OPAP…

Read More

What is the process for preparing an Office action in inter partes reexamination?

The process for preparing an Office action in inter partes reexamination involves several steps and considerations. According to MPEP 2671.01, the process includes: Notification of the examiner upon receipt of a patent owner response (and third party requester comments, if applicable). Preparation for and setting up of a panel review conference (as per MPEP §…

Read More