How does the USPTO handle situations where the requirements for the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception are not fully met?

How does the USPTO handle situations where the requirements for the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception are not fully met? When the requirements for invoking the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception are not fully met, the USPTO follows a specific procedure. According to MPEP 717.02(b): “If the requirements have not been met, the examiner will…

Read More

How is the sequence of examination determined in Patentability Report cases?

The sequence of examination in Patentability Report (P.R.) cases is determined through collaboration between supervisory patent examiners. According to MPEP 705.01(b): “In the event that the supervisory patent examiners concerned in a P.R. case cannot agree as to the order of examination by their Technology Centers (TCs), the supervisory patent examiner having jurisdiction of the…

Read More