How do confidentiality requirements affect Internet searching for unpublished patent applications?

Confidentiality requirements significantly impact Internet searching for unpublished patent applications. The MPEP states: “When the Internet is used to search, browse, or retrieve information relating to a patent application which has not been published, other than a reissue application or reexamination proceeding, Patent Organization users MUST restrict search queries to the general state of the…

Read More

What is the “article of manufacture” requirement for computer-generated icons in design patents?

The “article of manufacture” requirement for computer-generated icons in design patents stipulates that the icon must be embodied in a computer screen, monitor, other display panel, or portion thereof to satisfy 35 U.S.C. 171. This is because a patentable design is inseparable from the object to which it is applied and cannot exist alone merely…

Read More

How should examiners handle multiple dependent claims in patent applications?

How should examiners handle multiple dependent claims in patent applications? When dealing with multiple dependent claims in patent applications, examiners must follow specific guidelines. The MPEP 707.07(i) states: ‘When examining an application with multiple dependent claims, the examiner should make certain that each multiple dependent claim is proper.’ Examiners are instructed to: Ensure that multiple…

Read More

What are the general guidelines for conducting interviews in patent applications?

The general guidelines for conducting interviews in patent applications are outlined in MPEP 713.01. Key points include: Interviews must be conducted on Office premises and within Office hours, as designated by examiners. Interviews for discussing patentability typically won’t occur before the first Office action, unless it’s a continuing or substitute application. Face-to-face interviews may be…

Read More

How should patent examiners communicate rejections not based on prior art?

According to MPEP 706.03, patent examiners should communicate rejections not based on prior art in a clear and thorough manner. The MPEP states: “Deficiencies should be explained clearly, particularly when they serve as a basis for a rejection. Whenever practicable, USPTO personnel should indicate how rejections may be overcome and how problems may be resolved.”…

Read More

What are the requirements for citing prior art in a patent examiner’s office action?

What are the requirements for citing prior art in a patent examiner’s office action? When citing prior art in an office action, patent examiners must follow specific requirements to ensure clarity and completeness. According to MPEP 707.05, examiners should: Cite domestic and foreign patents by document number, kind code, and date Include the name of…

Read More