How does the USPTO handle terms of degree in patent claims?

The USPTO handles terms of degree in patent claims by evaluating whether the specification provides some standard for measuring that degree. According to MPEP 2173.02: “Terms of degree are not necessarily indefinite… If the specification does provide some standard for measuring that degree, a rejection is not warranted… For example, in Ex parte Oetiker, 23…

Read More

How does the USPTO examine for written description compliance?

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has specific procedures for examining written description compliance in patent applications. According to MPEP 2163.01: “While the test or analysis of description requirement and new matter issues is the same, the examining procedure and statutory basis for addressing these issues differ.” Examiners typically compare the claims to…

Read More

How does examination work for international design applications designating the United States?

The examination process for international design applications designating the United States involves several steps: Receipt and Examination: The USPTO examines international design applications based on the published international registration received from the International Bureau. Substantive Examination: As stated in the MPEP, “Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 389, the USPTO will examine international design applications designating the…

Read More

How does the USPTO determine the inventor’s field of endeavor in patent applications?

The USPTO determines the inventor’s field of endeavor by examining the content of the patent application, particularly the specification. According to MPEP 2141.01(a): “The examiner must determine what is ‘analogous prior art’ for the purpose of analyzing the obviousness of the subject matter at issue. ‘The determination of what is analogous prior art is fact…

Read More

How does the USPTO determine if a negative limitation has written description support?

How does the USPTO determine if a negative limitation has written description support? The USPTO examines negative limitations for written description support based on the guidance provided in MPEP 2173.05(i). The key factors include: Express disclosure in the specification Inherent disclosure based on what is described Original claims Drawings that show the absence of a…

Read More