Can a patent be reinstated after expiration due to non-payment of maintenance fees?
Yes, a patent can be reinstated after expiration due to non-payment of maintenance fees under certain conditions. The MPEP 2590 outlines the process for patent reinstatement: “The patent may be reinstated if the delay in payment of the maintenance fee was unintentional.” Key points about patent reinstatement: A petition for reinstatement must be filed within…
Read MoreWhat is the process for accepting delayed payment of maintenance fees in expired patents?
The Director of the USPTO may accept delayed payment of maintenance fees for expired patents if the delay is shown to be unintentional. According to MPEP 2590, the process involves: Filing a petition under 37 CFR 1.378(b) Paying the required maintenance fee Paying the petition fee Submitting a statement that the delay was unintentional The…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO determine if a delay in filing a reissue application was unintentional?
How does the USPTO determine if a delay in filing a reissue application was unintentional? The USPTO evaluates the unintentional nature of delays in filing reissue applications on a case-by-case basis. According to MPEP 1403: “In determining whether a delay in filing a reissue application was unintentional, the examiner should make an inquiry as to…
Read MoreCan an abandoned patent application be revived after failing to respond within the statutory period?
Yes, an abandoned patent application can potentially be revived even after failing to respond within the statutory period. The MPEP 711.02 provides guidance on this: “An abandoned application may be revived as a pending application if the delay in prosecution was unintentional.” To revive an abandoned application, the applicant must: File a petition to revive…
Read MoreHow can I revive a patent application abandoned due to failure to file a Notice of Foreign Filing?
If your patent application has been abandoned due to failure to file a timely Notice of Foreign Filing, you can revive it by filing a petition under 37 CFR 1.137. According to MPEP 1124, this is the sole remedy available to restore the application to pending status. The petition must include: The required reply (in…
Read MoreHow can I revive an abandoned patent application?
To revive an abandoned patent application, you need to file a petition under 37 CFR 1.137. According to MPEP 1002.02(b), the Deputy Commissioner who oversees the Office of Petitions or assigned staff handles: Petitions to revive an abandoned national, nonprovisional or provisional patent application on the basis of unintentional delay, 37 CFR 1.137 and MPEP…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for restoring the right of priority in a PCT application?
To restore the right of priority in a PCT application, the following requirements must be met: The international application must have an international filing date that is later than the date on which the priority period expired but within two months from that date. The request for restoration must be filed with the receiving Office…
Read MoreWhat is the restoration of the right of priority in international patent applications?
The restoration of the right of priority is a provision in the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) that allows applicants to request the restoration of priority rights for international patent applications filed after the expiration of the 12-month priority period but within two months of that expiration. According to MPEP 1828.01, “If the international application has…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for requesting restoration of the right of priority?
To request restoration of the right of priority for an international patent application, several requirements must be met. According to MPEP 1828.01: The request must be filed within two months from the expiration of the priority period. It must include a notice adding the priority claim if not already in the application. The petition fee…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between the “in spite of due care” and “unintentional” standards for priority restoration?
The PCT system recognizes two standards for restoring the right of priority: the “in spite of due care” standard and the “unintentional” standard. The United States, as a receiving office, only applies the “unintentional” standard. MPEP 1828.01 explains: “The International Bureau decides these matters under both the in spite of due care and unintentional standards.…
Read More