What are the requirements for a grantable petition under 37 CFR 1.137(a) for unintentional delay?

What are the requirements for a grantable petition under 37 CFR 1.137(a) for unintentional delay? A grantable petition under 37 CFR 1.137(a) for unintentional delay must meet specific requirements. According to MPEP 711.03(c), these requirements include: The reply required to the outstanding Office action or notice: This could be a response to a non-final Office…

Read More

What are the consequences of submitting a false statement of unintentional delay?

What are the consequences of submitting a false statement of unintentional delay? Submitting a false statement of unintentional delay to the USPTO can have serious consequences. The MPEP section 711.03(c) warns: 35 U.S.C. 41(a)(7) provides that the Office shall charge $[XXXXXX] on filing each petition for the revival of an abandoned application for a patent,…

Read More

How does the USPTO determine if a delay in filing a petition to revive was unintentional?

The USPTO considers the entire delay in filing a petition to revive when determining if it was unintentional. This includes the delay from the date of abandonment until the filing of a grantable petition. The MPEP 711.03(c) states: “The Director may require additional information where there is a question whether the delay was unintentional.” Key…

Read More

How does the USPTO determine if a delay in responding to an Office action was ‘unintentional’?

How does the USPTO determine if a delay in responding to an Office action was ‘unintentional’? The USPTO evaluates the circumstances surrounding the delay to determine if it was truly unintentional. According to MPEP 711.03(c): ‘The USPTO requires that a petition under 37 CFR 1.137(a) be accompanied by a statement that the entire delay in…

Read More

What happens if an applicant unintentionally delays filing a reply to an Office action?

What happens if an applicant unintentionally delays filing a reply to an Office action? If an applicant unintentionally delays filing a reply to an Office action beyond the set time period, the application may be considered abandoned. However, the applicant may petition to revive the application under 37 CFR 1.137(a). The MPEP states: An applicant…

Read More

What constitutes ‘unintentional’ delay for a revival petition?

‘Unintentional’ delay means the entire delay in filing the required reply from the due date until the filing of a grantable petition was unintentional. Some key points about unintentional delay: The USPTO generally accepts the statement of unintentional delay without requiring further information Deliberately choosing to abandon an application is not considered unintentional Changing one’s…

Read More