How can an applicant challenge an examiner’s use of official notice?
How can an applicant challenge an examiner’s use of official notice? An applicant can challenge an examiner’s use of official notice by following these steps: Traverse the official notice: The applicant should specifically traverse the use of official notice in their response to the Office action. Request evidence: As stated in MPEP 2144.03(C): “To adequately…
Read MoreWhat is a traverse in patent law?
In patent law, a traverse is a formal objection or disagreement with a requirement or decision made by the patent examiner. Specifically, in the context of restriction requirements, a traverse is a response where the applicant distinctly and specifically points out supposed errors in the restriction requirement. This is crucial because, as stated in MPEP…
Read MoreCan an applicant traverse a species election requirement?
Yes, an applicant can traverse (i.e., dispute or argue against) a species election requirement issued by the USPTO examiner. The MPEP 808.01(a) provides guidance on this process: “If applicant traverses on the ground that the species, or groupings of patentably indistinct species from which election is required, are not patentably distinct, applicant should submit evidence…
Read MoreWhat is a traverse in response to a restriction requirement?
A traverse is a request for reconsideration of a requirement to restrict that must include a written statement of the reasons for traverse. According to MPEP 818.01, a traverse must “distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors upon which the applicant relies for concluding that the requirement is in error.” The MPEP states: “A…
Read MoreHow can an applicant respond to a restriction requirement in a design patent application?
When responding to a restriction requirement in a design patent application, an applicant has several options: Elect one group of designs for prosecution without traverse. Elect one group of designs for prosecution with traverse, providing arguments against the restriction. Petition to review the requirement. If electing with traverse, the MPEP advises: “If a response to…
Read MoreWhat is a proper traverse of a restriction requirement with linking claims?
A proper traverse of a restriction requirement with linking claims must include a written statement that specifically points out the supposed errors in the requirement. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) Section 818.01(d) states: “Regardless of the presence of a linking claim, a proper traverse must include a written statement of the reasons for…
Read MoreHow can an applicant preserve the right to petition a restriction requirement?
To preserve the right to petition a restriction requirement, an applicant must follow specific steps as outlined in MPEP 818.01(c): File a timely traverse to the restriction requirement Distinctly and specifically point out all errors to be relied upon in the petition File the petition not later than the filing date of the notice of…
Read MoreHow do I properly traverse a restriction requirement?
To properly traverse a restriction requirement, you must follow the guidelines set forth in MPEP 818.01(c). The key elements of a proper traverse are: Timeliness: The traverse must be filed in a timely manner, typically in response to the restriction requirement. Specificity: As stated in the MPEP, “all errors to be relied upon in the…
Read MoreHow does failing to traverse affect a patent application?
Failing to properly traverse a restriction requirement in a patent application can have significant consequences. According to MPEP 818.01(c): If applicant does not distinctly and specifically point out supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election should be treated as an election without traverse and be so indicated to the applicant by use of form…
Read MoreWhat happens after an applicant elects with traverse in a restriction requirement?
After an applicant elects with traverse in a restriction requirement, the examiner must reconsider the requirement. If the examiner maintains the restriction, they should: Make the requirement final in the next Office action Reply to the applicant’s arguments Use Form Paragraph 8.25 to make the restriction final As stated in the MPEP, “Where the initial…
Read More