What is a decision denying reexamination?
A decision denying reexamination is a formal response issued by a patent examiner when a request for inter partes reexamination fails to establish a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) or a reasonable likelihood of prevailing (RLP) based on patents or printed publications. As stated in the MPEP: “The request for reexamination will be denied…
Read MoreWhat is the time frame for the USPTO to determine if a Substantial New Question (SNQ) of patentability is raised in a supplemental examination request?
According to MPEP 2816, the USPTO is required to make a determination within three months following the filing date of a request for supplemental examination. Specifically, the MPEP states: “35 U.S.C. 257(a) and 37 CFR 1.620(b) require that, within three months following the filing date of a request for supplemental examination, the Office will determine…
Read MoreWhat standard does the USPTO use to determine if an item of information raises a Substantial New Question (SNQ) of patentability in a supplemental examination?
The USPTO uses the same standard for determining whether an item of information raises a Substantial New Question (SNQ) of patentability in supplemental examination as it does for ex parte reexaminations. According to MPEP 2816: “The standard for determining whether an item of information properly submitted as part of the request raises a SNQ will…
Read MoreWhat should be included in the determination for a supplemental examination request?
The determination for a supplemental examination request should include: An identification of each item of information A statement of each issue raised by each item of information The basis for the determination of each issue A finding for each issue as to whether the item of information raises a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ)…
Read MoreWhat happens after a supplemental examination is concluded?
After a supplemental examination is concluded, the Office electronically publishes a supplemental examination certificate. As stated in MPEP 2818, “Supplemental examination is concluded by the electronic publication of the certificate.” The subsequent procedure depends on whether a Substantial New Question of patentability (SNQ) is raised: If an SNQ is raised, an ex parte reexamination is…
Read MoreWhat claims are considered in a supplemental examination determination?
In a supplemental examination, the Office considers the claims of the patent that are in effect at the time of the determination. Specifically, “The claims of the patent in effect at the time of the determination will be the basis for deciding whether ‘a substantial new question of patentability’ (SNQ) is present.” (MPEP 2816.01) However,…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of a “substantial new question of patentability” in supplemental examination?
A “substantial new question of patentability” (SNQ) is crucial in supplemental examination as it determines whether further action is necessary. The MPEP 2816.03 states: “The determination must identify each item of information that raises a substantial new question of patentability.” The significance of an SNQ in supplemental examination includes: It indicates that the submitted information…
Read MoreWhat is a “substantial new question of patentability” in patent reexamination?
A “substantial new question of patentability” (SNQ) is the key criterion for deciding whether to order reexamination of a patent under 35 U.S.C. 302. According to the MPEP 2242, an SNQ exists when: Prior art patents or printed publications raise a substantial question of patentability for at least one claim, and The same question has…
Read MoreCan a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) be based on old art in supplemental examination?
Yes, a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) can be based on old art in supplemental examination, provided it is presented or viewed in a new light compared to previous examinations. The MPEP clarifies: Reliance on old art does not necessarily preclude the existence of a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) that is based…
Read MoreWhat is a substantial new question of patentability in inter partes reexamination?
A substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) is a key criterion for granting inter partes reexamination requests filed before September 16, 2011. It refers to a question that: Has not been raised in a previous examination of the patent Is likely to be considered important by a reasonable examiner in determining patentability Is based on…
Read More