What options does a patentee have regarding interference proceedings?
While a patentee cannot directly suggest an interference, they have two main options regarding interference proceedings: File a reissue application: By filing a reissue application, a patentee can become an applicant, which would then allow them to suggest an interference. Alert the examiner: As stated in MPEP 2304.03, “A patentee may, however, to the limited…
Read MoreHow can a patentee add or amend claims during an interference?
A patentee can add or amend claims during an interference by filing a reissue application. According to MPEP 2308.02: “A patentee may file a reissue application in support of a motion to add or amend a claim.” This process allows patentees to modify their claims in response to issues raised during the interference proceeding, potentially…
Read MoreWhat is the difference in handling protests for original and reissue applications?
The main difference in handling protests for original and reissue applications lies in their accessibility to the public. MPEP 1901.05 outlines this distinction: Original applications: These are kept confidential unless published or made available under specific conditions. Reissue applications: As stated in the MPEP, “Reissue applications filed on, or after, March 1, 1977 are pursuant…
Read MoreHow does litigation affect the priority of patent cases at the USPTO?
Litigation has a significant impact on the priority of patent cases at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). According to MPEP 2261, cases involved in litigation are given the highest priority in processing. The MPEP specifically states: “Any cases involved in litigation, whether they are reexamination proceedings or reissue applications, will have priority…
Read MoreWhat is the requirement for ‘lack of deceptive intention’ in reissue applications?
For reissue applications filed before September 16, 2012, there was a specific requirement regarding ‘lack of deceptive intention’. The MPEP states: For reissue applications filed prior to September 16, 2012, both pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 251 and pre-AIA 37 CFR 1.175 require that the reissue oath or declaration must state that the error arose “without any…
Read MoreWhat is the relationship between fraud in the original patent and a reissue application?
The MPEP clearly establishes a direct relationship between fraud in the original patent and any subsequent reissue application. It states: Clearly, “fraud” practiced or attempted in an application which issues as a patent is “fraud” practiced or attempted in connection with any subsequent application to reissue that patent. The reissue application and the patent are…
Read MoreHow does fraud or inequitable conduct affect reissue applications?
Fraud, inequitable conduct, or violation of duty of disclosure in the original patent application can significantly impact reissue applications. The MPEP states: “Fraud” cannot be purged through the reissue process. This means that if fraud was committed in the original application, it cannot be remedied by filing a reissue application. Furthermore, the MPEP notes: Clearly,…
Read MoreWho is responsible for monitoring and reviewing reissue applications?
Reissue applications are monitored and reviewed by different personnel depending on their assignment: For applications assigned to Technology Centers (TCs): Training Quality Assurance Specialists (TQASs) For applications assigned to the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU): Supervisory Patent Reexamination Specialists (SPRS) According to MPEP 1456: “All reissue applications assigned to the Technology Centers (TCs) are monitored and…
Read MoreWhen is it necessary to inspect previously abandoned application papers or granted patents during patent examination?
During patent examination, it becomes necessary to inspect previously abandoned application papers or granted patents in certain situations: When examining a reissue application During a reexamination proceeding In other cases where historical information or prior art is relevant to the current examination The MPEP clearly states: In the examination of an application, it is sometimes…
Read MoreWhen is it necessary to inspect previously abandoned application files or granted patents?
Inspection of previously abandoned application files or granted patents becomes necessary in certain situations during patent examination: When examining a reissue application During a reexamination proceeding When evaluating potential prior art To understand the prosecution history of related applications MPEP 901.01(a) states: “In the examination of an application, it is sometimes necessary to inspect the…
Read More