Can a reissue application be used to correct inventorship?
Yes, a reissue application can be used to correct inventorship. The MPEP 201.05 states: ‘A reissue application may also be filed to correct inventorship in the patent. The reissue oath or declaration must state that the applicant believes the original patent to be wholly or partly inoperative or invalid by reason of the incorrect inventorship.’…
Read MoreWhen is a reissue application necessary to perfect a foreign priority claim?
A reissue application is necessary to perfect a foreign priority claim in the following situations: When the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d) or (f) were not satisfied in the patented application or its parent prior to issuance. When the requirements of 37 CFR 1.55 are not met. When the correction sought would require further examination.…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for an oath or declaration in a reissue application?
What are the requirements for an oath or declaration in a reissue application? In a reissue application, the oath or declaration must comply with specific requirements outlined in MPEP 1414. The MPEP states: “The reissue oath/declaration must include a statement that the applicant believes the original patent to be wholly or partly inoperative or invalid.”…
Read MoreHow does a reissue application affect the original patent’s term?
A reissue application does not affect the original patent’s term. According to MPEP 201.05, ‘The reissue application is a continuation of the original application and the reissue patent will expire at the same time that the original patent would have expired.’ This means that: The term of the reissue patent remains the same as the…
Read MoreHow does a reissue application differ from a regular patent application?
A reissue application differs from a regular patent application in several key ways: Purpose: A reissue application is specifically for correcting defects in an existing, unexpired patent, while a regular application is for obtaining a new patent. Timing: Reissue applications can only be filed for unexpired patents, whereas regular applications are filed before a patent…
Read MoreWhat is the time limit for filing a reissue application?
What is the time limit for filing a reissue application? There is no specific time limit for filing a reissue application. However, the two-year rule mentioned in MPEP 1403 states: “A reissue application can be filed within two years from the grant of the original patent without any specific explanation for the delay.“ If more…
Read MoreWhat is required to add a benefit claim after the initial filing of a patent application?
Adding a benefit claim after the time period required by 37 CFR 1.78 requires a petition and the petition fee. As stated in MPEP § 211.04: Any petition under 37 CFR 1.78 must be accompanied by a corrected ADS in compliance with 37 CFR 1.76(c) (for applications filed on or after September 16, 2012), or…
Read MoreAre substitute specifications allowed in reissue applications or reexamination proceedings?
No, substitute specifications are not permitted in reissue applications or reexamination proceedings. This is explicitly stated in 37 CFR 1.125(d): A substitute specification under this section is not permitted in a reissue application or in a reexamination proceeding. This restriction is important to maintain the integrity of the original patent document in these special proceedings.…
Read MoreCan a petition for an unintentionally delayed priority claim be filed after the patent issues?
Yes, a petition for an unintentionally delayed priority claim can be filed after a patent issues, but it requires a different procedure. According to MPEP 214.02: For applications that have issued as patents, a petition filed under 37 CFR 1.55(e) or 1.78(c) and (e) may be filed as a reissue application, a request for certificate…
Read MoreAre USPTO employees allowed to initiate email communications with patent applicants?
USPTO employees are generally not permitted to initiate email communications with patent applicants unless there is a written authorization on record. According to MPEP 502.03: ‘USPTO employees are NOT permitted to initiate communications with applicants via Internet email unless there is a written authorization of record in the patent application by the applicant.’ However, if…
Read More