Where can I find detailed information on correcting inventorship in reexamination proceedings?

For detailed information on correcting inventorship in both inter partes and ex parte reexamination proceedings, you should refer to MPEP ยง 2250.02. The MPEP ยง 2666.03 specifically directs readers to this section: “See MPEP ยง 2250.02 for the manner of correcting inventorship in both inter partes and ex parte reexamination proceedings.” MPEP ยง 2250.02 provides…

Read More

How does the standard for materiality in reexamination differ from original prosecution?

How does the standard for materiality in reexamination differ from original prosecution? The standard for materiality in reexamination proceedings is different from that in original prosecution. MPEP 2280 clarifies this distinction: “However, the criteria for materiality in a reexamination proceeding is narrower than in a reissue application. […] For the purposes of a reexamination proceeding,…

Read More

How is information deemed material to patentability in reexamination proceedings?

In reexamination proceedings, information is considered material to patentability when it is not cumulative to information already of record and meets certain criteria. According to MPEP 2280, which cites 37 CFR 1.555(b): “Information is material to patentability in a reexamination proceeding when it is not cumulative to information of record or being made of record…

Read More

What types of information are considered material in reexamination proceedings?

What types of information are considered material in reexamination proceedings? In reexamination proceedings, certain types of information are considered material to patentability. According to MPEP 2280, material information includes: Prior art patents or printed publications that are material to patentability under 37 CFR 1.56(b) Information on enablement, written description, and utility that is material to…

Read More

How does litigation affect the priority of patent cases at the USPTO?

Litigation has a significant impact on the priority of patent cases at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). According to MPEP 2261, cases involved in litigation are given the highest priority in processing. The MPEP specifically states: “Any cases involved in litigation, whether they are reexamination proceedings or reissue applications, will have priority…

Read More

What are the requirements for filing an Information Disclosure Statement in reexamination proceedings?

Filing an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) in reexamination proceedings has specific requirements. MPEP 2280 states: “Individuals are strongly encouraged to file information disclosure statements in accordance with 37 CFR 1.98, within two months of the date of the order to reexamine, or as soon thereafter as possible, in order to bring the patents or printed…

Read More

What is the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings?

What is the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings? The duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings is a crucial aspect of patent law. According to MPEP 2280, “The duty of disclosure requirements for individuals associated with the patent owner in a reexamination proceeding is the same as for individuals associated with the patent owner in…

Read More

Can parties submit copies of copending reexamination proceedings to a patent file?

No, parties are not permitted to submit copies of copending reexamination proceedings or applications to a patent file. The MPEP 2207 clearly states: “It is not required nor is it permitted that parties submit copies of copending reexamination proceedings and applications (which copies can be mistaken for a new request/filing); rather, submitters may provide a…

Read More