Who can submit prior art during a pending reexamination proceeding?

While there are general limitations on prior art submissions during reexamination proceedings, certain parties are allowed to submit prior art. According to MPEP 2204, the following exceptions apply: “[S]ubmissions filed after the date of any order to reexamine will not be entered into the patent file until the pending reexamination proceeding has been concluded (37…

Read More

What does “special dispatch” mean in the context of reexamination proceedings?

“Special dispatch” in the context of reexamination proceedings refers to the expedited handling and processing of these cases by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This term is derived from 35 U.S.C. 305 and is further explained in MPEP 2261. The MPEP states: “In view of the requirement for ‘special dispatch,’ reexamination proceedings…

Read More

What is the difference in priority between reexamination proceedings and reissue applications?

According to MPEP 2261, there is no inherent difference in priority between reexamination proceedings and reissue applications at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The key factor determining their priority is whether they are involved in litigation. The MPEP states: “Any cases involved in litigation, whether they are reexamination proceedings or reissue applications,…

Read More

What is the time limit for requesting reconsideration of a decision on a petition to revive a reexamination proceeding?

The time limit for requesting reconsideration of a decision on a petition to revive a reexamination proceeding is two months from the mail date of the decision. The MPEP states: “Reconsideration may be requested of a decision dismissing or denying a petition under 37 CFR 1.137 to revive a terminated reexamination prosecution. The request for…

Read More

What is the purpose of limiting prior art submissions during reexamination?

The limitation on prior art submissions during reexamination proceedings serves a specific purpose. As stated in MPEP 2204: “The purpose of this rule is to prevent harassment of the patent owner due to frequent submissions of prior art citations during reexamination proceedings.” This rule helps maintain the integrity of the reexamination process by preventing potential…

Read More

What procedures are followed when transferring supplemental examination proceedings?

When transferring supplemental examination proceedings, the USPTO generally follows the same procedures established for transferring reexamination proceedings. The MPEP states, Although the number of supplemental examination requests which must be transferred to another examiner should be very small, the procedures established for transferring reexamination proceedings will be generally followed when transferring supplemental examination proceedings. For…

Read More

What types of patent proceedings might require a replacement deposit?

Replacement deposits may be required in various types of patent proceedings where the original deposit is no longer viable or accessible. MPEP 2407.03 specifically mentions two types of proceedings: “…for example a reissue or reexamination proceeding, where a deposit is considered to be necessary to satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112…” These proceedings include:…

Read More