What constitutes a “public use” under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)?
A “public use” under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b) occurs when the invention is in public use before the critical date and is ready for patenting. The Federal Circuit has explained that the proper test for the public use prong includes two key elements: The purported use was accessible to the public; or The invention was…
Read MoreWhat constitutes a “public use” under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)?
A “public use” under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) is defined in the MPEP 2152.02(c) as follows: “Public use” includes any use of the claimed invention by a person other than the inventor or a joint inventor, or any use of the claimed invention by the inventor or a joint inventor that is accessible to the public.…
Read MoreHow does the level of supervision affect public use in patent law?
The level of supervision during experimental use can significantly impact whether an activity is considered public use under patent law. According to MPEP 2133.03(e)(5): “The degree of supervision and control over the invention required of the inventor to establish experimental use is generally high.” This means that inventors must maintain substantial control over their invention…
Read MoreHow does secret use affect public use determinations in patent law?
Secret use of an invention can still constitute public use under certain circumstances, potentially affecting patentability. The MPEP 2133.03(a) states: “Secret use of an invention by the inventor or his agents for his own profit or advantage prior to the critical date is a bar to a patent […] even though the use may not…
Read MoreWhat constitutes “secret use” in patent law?
What constitutes “secret use” in patent law? In patent law, “secret use” refers to the use of an invention that is kept confidential and not accessible to the public. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2152.02(c) states: “An inventor’s private use or sale of the invention is not prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C.…
Read MoreHow does secret use of an invention affect its patentability?
Secret use of an invention can have significant implications for its patentability. While secret use does not typically constitute public use, it can still impact the ability to obtain a patent under certain circumstances. According to MPEP 2133.03(a): “Secret use is not public use under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). However, a non-secret use by someone other…
Read MoreCan a secret use of an invention constitute public use?
Yes, in some circumstances, a secret or confidential use of an invention can constitute public use under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b). The MPEP explains: “[S]ecrecy of use alone is not sufficient to show that existing knowledge has not been withdrawn from public use; commercial exploitation is also forbidden.” (MPEP 2133.03(a)) This means that even if…
Read MoreCan a secret commercial use be considered a “public use” for patent purposes?
Yes, a secret commercial use can be considered a “public use” for patent purposes. The MPEP 2152.02(c) states: “[A] secret or confidential use by an inventor or someone working with the inventor, which use is commercial in character, is considered a public use even though no member of the public viewed the use.” This interpretation…
Read MoreWhat constitutes a “ready for patenting” invention in the context of public use?
An invention is considered “ready for patenting” in the context of public use when it has been reduced to practice or when the inventor has prepared drawings or other descriptions of the invention that are sufficiently specific to enable a person skilled in the art to practice the invention. This concept is crucial in determining…
Read MoreWhat types of questions are not considered in ex parte reexamination requests?
Ex parte reexamination requests under 35 U.S.C. 302 are limited to questions of patentability based on prior art patents or printed publications. The MPEP 2216 explicitly states that certain types of questions should not be included in such requests: “Questions relating to grounds of rejection other than those based on prior art patents or printed…
Read More