What is the distinction between a process of making and a product made?
A process of making and a product made by the process can be shown to be distinct inventions if either or both of the following can be demonstrated: (A) The process as claimed is not an obvious process of making the product and can be used to make another materially different product, or (B) The…
Read MoreHow can an applicant overcome a restriction requirement between a product and its process of making or using?
An applicant can overcome a restriction requirement between a product and its process of making or using in several ways: Traverse the requirement: Argue that the restriction is improper by showing that the product cannot be made by a materially different process or used in a materially different way. Amend the claims: Modify the claims…
Read MoreWhat is MPEP 821.04 and how does it relate to rejoinder of claims?
MPEP 821.04 is a section of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure that provides detailed guidance on the rejoinder of claims. The MPEP 1302.04(h) specifically references this section: “See MPEP § 821.04.” MPEP 821.04 covers various aspects of rejoinder, including: Conditions for rejoinder of non-elected inventions Rejoinder of process claims Rejoinder of product claims Procedures…
Read MoreWhat is the “Linking Claim” requirement for rejoinder?
A “linking claim” is a key requirement for rejoinder in patent applications. According to MPEP 821.04: “Where applicant elects claims directed to the product, and the product claims are subsequently found allowable, withdrawn process claims that depend from or otherwise require all the limitations of the allowable product claim will be considered for rejoinder.” This…
Read MoreWhat are the key considerations for patent attorneys when drafting apparatus and product claims?
When drafting apparatus and product claims, patent attorneys should consider the following key points to navigate potential restriction requirements: Clearly differentiate between apparatus and product claims Consider the relationship between the apparatus and the product it produces Draft claims that highlight the unique features of both the apparatus and the product Be prepared to argue…
Read MoreWhen can process of using claims be joined with product and process of making claims?
Process of using claims can be joined with product and process of making claims under certain circumstances. The MPEP 806.05(i) states: “If the process of making and the product are not distinct, the process of using may be joined with the claims directed to the product and the process of making the product even though…
Read MoreHow does the examiner formulate a restriction requirement between product and process of making?
When formulating a restriction requirement between a product and a process of making, examiners are instructed to use specific form paragraphs as outlined in MPEP 806.05(f). The key form paragraph is 8.18, which states: “[1] and [2] are related as process of making and product made. The inventions are distinct if either or both of…
Read MoreWhat are the form paragraphs used in restriction requirements for product and process of using?
The MPEP 806.05(h) specifies that form paragraphs 8.20 and 8.21.04 should be used in restriction requirements between the product and method of using. These form paragraphs serve specific purposes: Form Paragraph 8.20: Used to explain the relationship between product and process of use inventions and to state the reasons for distinctness. Form Paragraph 8.21.04: Provides…
Read MoreWhat is Form Paragraph 8.20 and when is it used in patent examination?
Form Paragraph 8.20 is a standardized text used by patent examiners in specific situations related to restriction requirements. The MPEP 806.05(i) mentions: “Form paragraph 8.20 (See MPEP § 806.05(h)) may be used in product, process of making and process of using situations where the product cannot be restricted from the process of making the product.”…
Read MoreWhat is Form Paragraph 8.19 and how is it used in patent examination?
Form Paragraph 8.19 is a standardized text used by patent examiners to communicate a restriction requirement between apparatus and product claims. According to MPEP 806.05(g), it states: “¶ 8.19 Apparatus and Product Made Inventions [1] and [2] are related as apparatus and product made. The inventions in this relationship are distinct if either or both…
Read More