Can prior art considered during the original patent examination be used again in a reissue application?

Yes, prior art that was considered during the original patent examination can be used again in a reissue application. The MPEP 1445 clearly states: “Likewise, the fact that during prosecution of the patent the examiner considered, may have considered, or should have considered information such as, for example, a specific prior art document, does not…

Read More

What is considered prior art for international preliminary examination?

According to MPEP 1878.01(a), prior art for international preliminary examination is defined in PCT Rule 64.1(a) as: “everything made available to the public anywhere in the world by means of written disclosure (including drawings and other illustrations) … provided that such making available occurred prior to the relevant date.“ The relevant date is typically the…

Read More

What constitutes prior art for international patent searches?

According to MPEP 1843.01, prior art for international patent searches consists of: Everything made available to the public worldwide by written disclosure (including drawings and illustrations) Content capable of assisting in determining if the claimed invention is new or involves an inventive step Disclosures made available to the public prior to the international filing date…

Read More

What is considered prior art for international patent applications?

According to MPEP 1878.01(a), prior art for international patent applications is defined in PCT Rule 64.1(a) as: “everything made available to the public anywhere in the world by means of written disclosure (including drawings and other illustrations) … provided that such making available occurred prior to the relevant date.” The ‘relevant date’ is generally the…

Read More

What is the role of prior art in design patent nonobviousness determinations?

What is the role of prior art in design patent nonobviousness determinations? Prior art plays a crucial role in determining nonobviousness for design patents. According to MPEP 1504.03: “The obviousness inquiry is conducted from the perspective of the ordinary designer. In order to support a rejection on this basis, the examiner must make factual findings…

Read More

What is the definition of “prior art” in patent law?

The term “prior art” in patent law refers to all information that has been made available to the public before a given date that might be relevant to a patent’s claims of originality. This includes existing patents, published patent applications, and other publicly available documents or information. While the MPEP 901 doesn’t provide a direct…

Read More

What are the primary search tools available to patent examiners?

The primary search tools available to patent examiners include: The Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system The United States Patent Classification (USPC) system Various automated search tools and databases According to MPEP 902, “The primary classification and search tools used by the USPTO are the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system, the United States Patent Classification (USPC)…

Read More

What is the significance of the “primary reference” in design patent obviousness rejections?

The concept of a “primary reference” is crucial in design patent obviousness rejections. The MPEP explains: “In order to support a holding of obviousness, a primary reference must be more than a design concept; it must have an appearance substantially the same as the claimed design.“ Key aspects of the primary reference in design patent…

Read More