What is the significance of the ‘reasonable explanation’ requirement in 37 CFR 1.130(a) declarations?

The ‘reasonable explanation’ requirement in 37 CFR 1.130(a) declarations is crucial for establishing the credibility and sufficiency of the declaration. MPEP 717.01(a)(1) states: The ‘reasonable explanation’ requirement of 37 CFR 1.130(a) provides the USPTO with the means to obtain additional information regarding the disclosure and to ensure that the patent application satisfies the statutory requirement…

Read More

How do examiners handle applications where common ownership or a joint research agreement has not been established?

According to MPEP 717.02(c), when examining applications where common ownership or a joint research agreement has not been established, examiners will: Assume the subject matter disclosed in the reference is not excepted under 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) Examine the application on all grounds other than the possible exception Consider the applicability of references under 35 U.S.C.…

Read More