How does the grace period inventor-originated disclosure exception differ from other prior art exceptions?

The grace period inventor-originated disclosure exception under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(A) is a specific type of prior art exception with unique characteristics: Source of Disclosure: It applies to disclosures made by the inventor, a joint inventor, or someone who obtained the subject matter directly or indirectly from the inventor or joint inventor. Time Frame: It…

Read More

How does the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) exception handle genus-species relationships?

The AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) exception has specific rules for handling genus-species relationships between the inventor’s prior disclosure and the intervening U.S. patent document. The MPEP provides clear guidance on this: Species disclosed by inventor, genus in intervening document: “If the inventor or a joint inventor had publicly disclosed a species, and a subsequent intervening…

Read More

What is the significance of the “effective filing date” in AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) exceptions?

The “effective filing date” is a crucial concept in determining the applicability of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) exceptions. As explained in MPEP 2153: “The exceptions in AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) are only applicable to disclosures that occurred within the one year period before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.” The effective filing date…

Read More

What is the effective date for applying AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception?

What is the effective date for applying AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception? The effective date for applying the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception is crucial for determining its applicability. According to MPEP 2154.02(c): “Even if the only differences between the subject matter disclosed by the reference and the claimed invention were made pursuant to a…

Read More

How can common ownership or a Joint Research Agreement help overcome a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejection?

Common ownership or evidence of a Joint Research Agreement can be used to overcome a 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) rejection by establishing entitlement to the 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) exception. This exception removes certain disclosures from being considered prior art. MPEP 2152.06 states: “Establishing common ownership or establishing evidence of a Joint Research Agreement to overcome a…

Read More

Does the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) exception require a comparison with the claimed invention?

No, the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) exception does not require a comparison with the claimed invention. The MPEP clearly states: “AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) does not discuss ‘the claimed invention’ with respect to either the subject matter disclosed by the inventor or a joint inventor, or the subject matter of the subsequent intervening U.S. patent…

Read More

How does the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) exception differ from the AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) exception?

While both exceptions relate to prior public disclosures by inventors, there are key differences: AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1)(B) applies to disclosures made within the grace period (1 year before the effective filing date). AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(B) has no grace period limitation and can apply to any U.S. patent document, regardless of its potential prior…

Read More