What is the test for obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a)?

The test for obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) is outlined in form paragraph 7.23.fti. This paragraph summarizes the factual inquiries established by the Supreme Court in Graham v. John Deere Co.: The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows: Determining the scope and…

Read More

How are rejections under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) formulated?

Rejections under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are formulated using form paragraph 7.21.fti. This paragraph provides the basic structure for stating the rejection: Claim [1] is/are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over [2]. The examiner fills in the claim numbers being rejected in bracket [1] and the prior art reference(s) being relied…

Read More

How does the CREATE Act affect provisional rejections under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a)?

The Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement Act of 2004 (CREATE Act) affects provisional rejections under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) by potentially disqualifying certain prior art references. The MPEP states: For applications filed on or after November 29, 1999 or pending on or after December 10, 2004, a provisional rejection under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) using…

Read More