How does the USPTO assess the materiality of information in supplemental examination?
The USPTO’s assessment of the materiality of information in supplemental examination is guided by the principles outlined in MPEP 2816.02. Key aspects of this assessment include: Materiality is evaluated in the context of patentability Information is material if it creates a substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) The standard is whether a reasonable examiner would…
Read MoreHow does MPEP 2114 relate to product-by-process claims?
While MPEP 2114 primarily focuses on apparatus and article claims with functional language, it also touches on product-by-process claims, which are a special type of product claim. The key points relating to product-by-process claims are: Product-by-process claims are not limited to the manipulations of the recited steps, only the structure implied by the steps. If…
Read MoreHow are product-by-process claims examined for patentability?
How are product-by-process claims examined for patentability? When examining product-by-process claims for patentability, patent examiners focus on the product itself rather than the process of making it. According to MPEP 2173.05(p): “The patentability of a product does not depend on its method of production. If the product in the product-by-process claim is the same as…
Read MoreHow does an examiner determine if suggesting an interference is appropriate?
An examiner determines if suggesting an interference is appropriate by carefully evaluating the claims and prior art. The MPEP 2304 provides guidance: “The examiner must decide whether a potential interference exists before suggesting an interference.” To make this decision, the examiner should: Analyze the claims: Compare the claims of the application under examination with those…
Read MoreHow does the written opinion assess the patentability of an invention?
The written opinion, issued along with the international search report, provides a preliminary and non-binding assessment of the patentability of the claimed invention. According to MPEP 1843, the written opinion evaluates several key aspects: “The written opinion indicates whether the claimed invention appears to be novel, to involve an inventive step (to be non-obvious), and…
Read More