What are the estoppel effects of inter partes reexamination?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-29 5 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Inter partes reexamination has significant estoppel effects that can impact…
Read MoreCan USPTO employees express opinions on patent validity or enforceability?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. No, USPTO employees are not permitted to express opinions on…
Read MoreWhat is the presumption of validity for patents?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Every issued patent is presumed to be valid under U.S.…
Read MoreHow does MPEP 805 interpret the last sentence of 35 U.S.C. 121?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 7 Rules4 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. MPEP 805 provides a clear interpretation of the last sentence…
Read MoreWhat is the effect of improper joinder on patent validity?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 10 Rules4 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. According to MPEP 805, improper joinder of inventions does not…
Read MoreWhat does 35 U.S.C. 121 say about patent validity and restriction requirements?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 10 Rules4 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. 35 U.S.C. 121 includes a crucial provision regarding patent validity…
Read MoreWhat protection does 35 U.S.C. 121 provide to patent holders regarding improper joinder?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-27 9 Rules4 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. 35 U.S.C. 121 provides significant protection to patent holders regarding…
Read MoreWhat effect do inoperative features have on a patent’s validity as prior art?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. Inoperative features in a patent do not necessarily invalidate its…
Read MoreWhat is the presumption of operability in patent law?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. The presumption of operability is a legal concept in patent law that assumes every…
Read MoreWhat is the significance of 35 U.S.C. 301 in citing prior art?
Source: FAQ (MPEP-Based)BlueIron Update: 2024-09-10 10 Rules5 Related FAQs This page is an FAQ based on guidance from the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. It is provided as guidance, with links to the ground truth sources. This is information only: it is not legal advice. 35 U.S.C. 301 plays a crucial role in the citation…
Read More