How does reapplying for a patent after abandoning a previous application affect rights under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(c)?

Reapplying for a patent after abandoning a previous application does not necessarily constitute abandonment under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(c). According to MPEP 2134: “Where there is no evidence of expressed intent or conduct by inventor to abandon the invention, delay in reapplying for patent after abandonment of a previous application does not constitute abandonment under…

Read More

How does the pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g)(1) affect patent rights in interference proceedings?

The pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g)(1) affects patent rights in interference proceedings by establishing conditions under which a person may not be entitled to a patent. According to MPEP 2301.01: “A person shall be entitled to a patent unless — (g)(1) during the course of an interference conducted under section 135 or section 291, another inventor…

Read More

How does the location of experimental use affect patent rights?

The location where experimental use occurs can have significant implications for patent rights. The MPEP 2133.03(e)(5) provides guidance on this matter: “Testing or experimentation performed in public may negate an assertion that there was a public use which was experimental.” This statement indicates that while public testing doesn’t automatically disqualify an activity from being considered…

Read More

Can the actions of individuals affect the rights of their employer in patent matters?

Yes, the actions of individuals can affect the rights of their employer in patent matters. The MPEP explicitly states: “However, it would apply to individuals within the corporation or institution who were substantively involved in the preparation or prosecution of the application, and actions by such individuals may affect the rights of the corporation or…

Read More

How does disposal of prototypes affect patent rights?

The disposal of prototypes before the critical date (typically one year before the patent application filing date) can affect patent rights. The MPEP provides guidance on how examiners should evaluate such situations: Where a prototype of an invention has been disposed of by an inventor before the critical date, inquiry by the examiner should focus…

Read More

What is the significance of confidentiality agreements in experimental use?

Confidentiality agreements play a crucial role in establishing experimental use and preventing public use in patent law. The MPEP 2133.03(e)(5) states: “Where the inventor or someone under his or her control is working on the invention without a confidentiality agreement or order of secrecy, there may be evidence of public use.” This highlights the importance…

Read More