How does ex parte reexamination differ from inter partes review?
Ex parte reexamination and inter partes review are two distinct procedures for reviewing patent validity. The key differences include: Participation: In ex parte reexamination, as described in MPEP 2209, the process is primarily between the patent owner and the USPTO. Third-party requesters have limited involvement after filing the request. In contrast, inter partes review allows…
Read MoreHow does the scope of ex parte reexamination differ from inter partes review?
How does the scope of ex parte reexamination differ from inter partes review? The scope of ex parte reexamination is more limited compared to inter partes review (IPR). Key differences include: Prior Art: Ex parte reexamination is limited to patents and printed publications, while IPR can consider a broader range of prior art. Grounds: Ex…
Read MoreWhat is the current status of covered business method reviews?
The status of covered business method (CBM) reviews has changed as of September 16, 2020. According to MPEP 1400.01: “No new petitions for covered business method reviews can be filed on or after September 16, 2020. Proceedings instituted on covered business method review petitions filed before September 16, 2020 will continue after September 16, 2020…
Read More