What is the legal basis for issuing multiple restriction requirements during patent prosecution?

The legal basis for issuing multiple restriction requirements during patent prosecution is found in 37 CFR 1.142(a). According to MPEP 811.02: “Since 37 CFR 1.142(a) provides that restriction is proper at any stage of prosecution up to final action, a second requirement may be made when it becomes proper, even though there was a prior…

Read More

How should I identify a national stage application when communicating with the USPTO?

When communicating with the USPTO regarding a national stage application, it’s important to use the correct identification information. The MPEP provides specific guidance: “Once an international application entering the U.S. national phase (“national stage application”) has been accorded a U.S. application number (the two digit series code followed by a six digit serial number), that…

Read More

Can I traverse an Election of Species requirement?

Yes, you can traverse (challenge) an Election of Species requirement. The MPEP 809.02(a) states: “The election may be made with or without traverse. To preserve a right to petition, the election must be made with traverse.” To traverse the requirement: Make your species election as required. Clearly state that your election is made “with traverse.”…

Read More

How do I respond to an Election of Species requirement?

To respond to an Election of Species requirement, you should follow these steps: Elect a single disclosed species or a single grouping of patentably indistinct species. Identify the claims encompassing the elected species or grouping. Optionally, include arguments traversing the requirement. According to MPEP 809.02(a): “Applicant is advised that the reply to this requirement to…

Read More

What happens when only generic claims are presented in a patent application?

When only generic claims are initially presented in a patent application, MPEP 818.02(b) provides guidance: If species claims are later presented, the examiner may require the applicant to elect a single species or a group of patentably indistinct species. This practice is further discussed in MPEP § 808.01(a). The MPEP states: “Where only generic claims…

Read More

Can I request expedited examination for a design reissue application?

Yes, expedited examination can be requested for design reissue applications. The process is as follows: File the design reissue application with a request under 37 CFR 1.155. The application undergoes expedited processing throughout the entire prosecution. The Design TC Director must grant the request for expedited examination. A waiver under 37 CFR 1.182 is considered…

Read More

What are examiner’s amendments in patent applications?

Examiner’s amendments are changes made to a patent application by the examiner, with the applicant’s authorization, to correct informalities or make minor adjustments. According to MPEP 1302.04, “An examiner’s amendment may be used to correct informalities in the body of the written portions of the specification as well as all errors and omissions in the…

Read More

What is an Examiner’s Amendment in patent prosecution?

What is an Examiner’s Amendment in patent prosecution? An Examiner’s Amendment is a formal amendment to a patent application made by the examiner with the applicant’s authorization. According to MPEP 1004, “Primary Examiners have the authority to grant Examiner’s Amendments.” This process allows for: Minor corrections to the application Clarification of claim language Resolving issues…

Read More