When do patent examiners need to obtain assignment information?
Patent examiners need to obtain assignment information in specific situations where the ownership of an application is significant. The MPEP 303 outlines two key scenarios: Conflicting claims in applications of different inventors: When multiple applications from different inventors contain claims that conflict with each other. Questions about who should direct prosecution: When there is uncertainty…
Read MoreWhat actions can an assignee take in a pre-AIA patent application?
An assignee of a pre-AIA patent application (filed before September 16, 2012) can take various actions once they have established ownership. According to MPEP 324, these actions include: Signing a reply to an Office action Requesting a continued prosecution application (CPA) Signing a terminal disclaimer Submitting a Fee(s) Transmittal form Requesting status of an application…
Read MoreWhat happens if an assignee’s ownership changes during patent prosecution?
If an assignee’s ownership changes during patent prosecution, it’s crucial to update the USPTO records. As per MPEP 325: “A new statement under 37 CFR 3.73(c) is required to be filed when ownership changes to another assignee.” This means that: The new assignee must file a new 37 CFR 3.73(c) statement. The new statement must…
Read MoreHow long does a patent application remain in ‘rejected’ status?
A patent application remains in ‘rejected’ status until one of two things happens: The applicant acts upon the examiner’s action within the allotted reply period, or The application becomes abandoned. As stated in MPEP 203.02: Its status as a ‘rejected’ application continues as such until acted upon by the applicant in reply to the examiner’s…
Read MoreWhat does ‘failure to take appropriate action’ mean in patent prosecution?
‘Failure to take appropriate action’ in patent prosecution refers to situations where an applicant doesn’t respond to Office actions or meet other required deadlines during the examination process. According to MPEP 203.05, an application can be abandoned: “through failure of applicant to take appropriate action at some stage in the prosecution of a nonprovisional application”…
Read MoreHow does the USPTO encourage interviews to expedite patent prosecution?
The USPTO actively encourages the use of interviews to expedite patent prosecution. According to MPEP § 408, The Office encourages the use of interviews to expedite prosecution. When an examiner believes an interview would advance the application’s progress, they may contact the patent practitioner of record to suggest a telephonic, personal, or video conference interview.…
Read MoreHow does a CPA affect the examination process?
Filing a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) has several effects on the examination process: The CPA is treated as a continuation of the prior application for examination purposes Information Disclosure Statements from the prior application are automatically considered in the CPA Affidavits and declarations from the prior application carry over to the CPA A terminal disclaimer…
Read MoreHow does filing a continuation application affect the prior application?
Filing a continuation application under 37 CFR 1.53(b) does not automatically abandon the prior application. The MPEP clearly states: Under 37 CFR 1.53(b) practice, the prior nonprovisional application is not automatically abandoned upon filing of the continuing application. However, applicants have several options regarding the status of the prior application: Express Abandonment: If desired, the…
Read MoreHow does a substitute application differ from a continuing application?
A substitute application is distinct from a continuing application in several ways. According to MPEP 201.02: ‘A substitute application is an application which is filed to take the place of a prior application and which is identified as such and discloses and claims only subject matter disclosed in the prior application.’ Key differences include: A…
Read MoreWhat types of affidavits or declarations are commonly filed in patent applications?
Common types of affidavits or declarations filed in patent applications include those submitted under specific sections of the Code of Federal Regulations. As mentioned in MPEP ¶ 2.03, these include: 37 CFR 1.130: Declarations of attribution or prior public disclosure under the AIA 37 CFR 1.131: Affidavits of prior invention to overcome cited patents or…
Read More