How does the USPTO handle submissions of copending reexamination proceedings and applications?
The USPTO has specific guidelines for handling submissions related to copending reexamination proceedings and applications. According to the MPEP: “It is not required nor is it permitted that parties submit copies of copending reexamination proceedings and applications (which copies can be mistaken for a new request/filing); rather, submitters may provide a notice identifying the application/proceeding…
Read MoreCan a patent owner petition to stay a reexamination proceeding because of an interference?
Yes, a patent owner can petition to stay a reexamination proceeding because of an interference, but there are specific rules and timing considerations: Any petition filed prior to the first Office action in the reexamination proceeding will not be considered and will be returned or expunged. The patent owner may file a petition to stay…
Read MoreIs there a sample form for attorney withdrawal from a patent proceeding?
Yes, the USPTO provides a sample form for attorney withdrawal from a patent proceeding. According to MPEP 2223: “A sample form for a request by an attorney or agent of record to withdraw from a patent is set forth below.” While the specific form is not included in this excerpt, practitioners can find the sample…
Read MoreHow can parties request a suspension of an interference due to a reexamination proceeding?
Parties can request a suspension of an interference due to a reexamination proceeding through two main methods: Motion to Suspend Interference: A party to the interference can file a miscellaneous motion under 37 CFR 41.121(a)(3) to suspend the interference pending the outcome of a reexamination proceeding. This motion must be presented to the Administrative Patent…
Read MoreWhat happens if a request for reexamination is filed during an interference?
When a request for reexamination is filed during an interference, the following procedures apply: The request for reexamination will be processed in the normal manner, without delay or stay, especially if the third party requester is not a party to the interference. Under 37 CFR 41.8(a), the patent owner must notify the Board that a…
Read MoreWhat does “reasonable notice” mean in the context of attorney withdrawal from patent proceedings?
In the context of attorney withdrawal from patent proceedings, “reasonable notice” is not strictly defined by a specific time period. According to MPEP 2623: “‘Reasonable notice’ would allow a reasonable amount of time for the client to seek the services of another practitioner prior to the expiration of any applicable response period.” This means that…
Read MoreHow is the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) defined in the MPEP?
The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) provides a comprehensive definition of the Board, which refers to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). According to MPEP 2301.02: “Board means the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and includes: (1) For a final Board action: (i) In an appeal or contested case, a panel of the…
Read MoreIs there a minimum time requirement for attorney withdrawal before a response deadline in patent proceedings?
No, there is no longer a minimum time requirement for attorney withdrawal before a response deadline in patent proceedings. The MPEP 2623 states: “For a practitioner to withdraw from a patent and/or reexamination proceeding, the Office no longer requires that there be at least 30 days remaining in any running period for response between the…
Read MoreIs there a minimum time requirement for attorney withdrawal in patent proceedings?
No, there is no longer a minimum time requirement for attorney withdrawal in patent proceedings. The MPEP 2223 states: “For a practitioner to withdraw from a patent and/or a reexamination proceeding, the Office no longer requires that there be at least 30 days remaining in any running period for response between the approval of a…
Read MoreWhat happens when multiple reexamination proceedings are filed for the same patent?
When multiple reexamination proceedings are filed for the same patent, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) may decide to merge the proceedings or suspend one of them. According to MPEP 2686.01, “Where a second request for reexamination is filed and reexamination is ordered, and a first reexamination proceeding is pending, the proceedings will be…
Read More