What is the “single means claim” in patent law?
A “single means claim” in patent law refers to a claim that recites a single element to perform a function without specifying any supporting structure or steps. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2164.08(a) states: “A single means claim, i.e., where a means recitation does not appear in combination with another recited element of…
Read MoreHow does the “single means claim” relate to the enablement requirement?
The “single means claim” is closely related to the enablement requirement in patent law. According to MPEP 2164.08(a): “Such claims are subject to rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, because the claim language is often not commensurate in scope with the enablement disclosure in the specification.” This means that…
Read MoreCan simulation or modeling satisfy the requirements for reduction to practice?
The question of whether simulation or modeling can satisfy the requirements for reduction to practice is complex and often depends on the specific circumstances of the invention. The MPEP 2138.05 does not directly address this issue, but general principles can be applied: Typically, actual reduction to practice requires physical construction and testing of the invention.…
Read MoreWhat is the difference between sexual and asexual reproduction in plant patents?
In the context of plant patents, the distinction between sexual and asexual reproduction is crucial. The MPEP 2121.03 highlights this difference in discussing the In re LeGrice case: “There was no evidence of commercial availability in enabling form since the asexually reproduced rose could not be reproduced from seed. Therefore, the public would not have…
Read MoreHow can a patent owner seek review of a Substantial New Question of Patentability (SNQ) determination?
A patent owner can seek review of a Substantial New Question of Patentability (SNQ) determination before the Board along with an appeal of the examiner’s rejections. The MPEP outlines the process: “To obtain review of the SNQ issue, patent owner must include the SNQ issue and the appropriate arguments in its appeal brief to the…
Read MoreWhat constitutes “secret use” in patent law?
What constitutes “secret use” in patent law? In patent law, “secret use” refers to the use of an invention that is kept confidential and not accessible to the public. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2152.02(c) states: “An inventor’s private use or sale of the invention is not prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C.…
Read MoreHow does secret use of an invention affect its patentability?
Secret use of an invention can have significant implications for its patentability. While secret use does not typically constitute public use, it can still impact the ability to obtain a patent under certain circumstances. According to MPEP 2133.03(a): “Secret use is not public use under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). However, a non-secret use by someone other…
Read MoreCan secret sales or offers trigger the on-sale bar in patent law?
Yes, secret sales or offers can trigger the on-sale bar in patent law. The MPEP 2152.02(d) states: “The courts have consistently held that an invention may be “on sale” even if the sale or offer is secret.” This means that even if a sale or offer is not publicly known, it can still affect the…
Read MoreCan a secret commercial use be considered a “public use” for patent purposes?
Yes, a secret commercial use can be considered a “public use” for patent purposes. The MPEP 2152.02(c) states: “[A] secret or confidential use by an inventor or someone working with the inventor, which use is commercial in character, is considered a public use even though no member of the public viewed the use.” This interpretation…
Read MoreWhat are secondary considerations in patent law?
Secondary considerations, also known as objective indicia of non-obviousness, are factors considered in patent law when evaluating the non-obviousness of an invention. These factors can include unexpected results, commercial success, long-felt but unsolved needs, and failure of others. However, it’s important to note that secondary considerations are not applicable to all types of patent rejections.…
Read More