What is a “Contracting Party” in the context of international design applications?

In the context of international design applications, a “Contracting Party” is defined by the Hague Agreement. According to MPEP 2904: “Article 1(xiii) defines a ‘Contracting Party’ as a State or intergovernmental organization that is a party to the Hague Agreement.” This means that a Contracting Party can be either: A State that has joined the…

Read More

What is the significance of contemporaneous recognition and appreciation in conception?

Contemporaneous recognition and appreciation of the invention is a crucial element in establishing conception in patent law. According to MPEP 2138.04: “There must be a contemporaneous recognition and appreciation of the invention for there to be conception.” This means that the inventor must recognize and understand the significance of their invention at the time it…

Read More

What is constructive notice in patent reexamination proceedings?

Constructive notice in patent reexamination proceedings is a legal concept where the USPTO provides public notification about the reexamination process when direct communication with the patent owner is not possible. This ensures that the reexamination can proceed even if the patent owner cannot be reached. According to MPEP 2230: “If all efforts to correspond with…

Read More

What are the consequences of failing to comply with the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings?

Failing to comply with the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings can have serious consequences. MPEP 2280 states: “Any fraud practiced or attempted on the Office or any violation of the duty of disclosure through bad faith or intentional misconduct by any such individual results in noncompliance with 37 CFR 1.555(a).” The consequences of non-compliance…

Read More

What is the difference between the exceptions in 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2)?

The exceptions in 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2) serve different purposes and apply to different types of prior art. Here’s a comparison: 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) Exceptions: Apply to disclosures that would be prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) Cover public disclosures made within one year before the effective filing date Include exceptions for inventor’s own…

Read More

What is common ownership under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c)?

Common ownership under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) means that the subject matter which would otherwise qualify as prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f), or (g) and the claimed invention must be entirely or wholly owned by, or under an obligation to assign to, the same person(s) or organization(s)/business entity(ies) at the time the…

Read More