How are other transitional phrases like “having” interpreted in patent claims?
The interpretation of other transitional phrases like “having” in patent claims depends on the context and the specification. The MPEP states, Transitional phrases such as “having” must be interpreted in light of the specification to determine whether open or closed claim language is intended. This means that unlike the more standardized phrases like “comprising” or…
Read MoreWhat is the meaning of “consisting essentially of” in patent claims?
The transitional phrase “consisting essentially of” in patent claims occupies a middle ground between “comprising” and “consisting of”. The MPEP explains, The transitional phrase “consisting essentially of” limits the scope of a claim to the specified materials or steps “and those that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s)” of the claimed invention.…
Read More