When is a Statement of Grant of Protection issued for an international design application?

A Statement of Grant of Protection is issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) after a patent has been granted on an international design application that designates the United States. This occurs specifically for nonprovisional international design applications. According to MPEP 2940: “Upon issuance of a patent on a nonprovisional international design…

Read More

What is a Statement of Grant of Protection in international design applications?

A Statement of Grant of Protection is a formal notification sent by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) after a patent is issued on an international design application designating the United States. This statement confirms that protection has been granted for the…

Read More

What is the significance of the six-month period between effective filing dates in interference cases?

The six-month period between effective filing dates plays a crucial role in determining how to proceed with potentially interfering applications. According to MPEP 2303.01: “If the applications have their earliest effective filing dates within six months of each other, then an interference may be suggested.“ This six-month window is used as a threshold for deciding…

Read More

Can a biological deposit be replaced after a patent is issued?

Generally, a biological deposit cannot be replaced after a patent is issued. According to MPEP 2407: “A replacement or supplemental deposit made in connection with an application for patent must be made before the patent issues.” This requirement ensures that the correct biological material is available to the public upon patent issuance. However, there are…

Read More

What is the policy on issuing patents with allowed claims in relation to potential interferences?

The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) emphasizes the importance of issuing patents with allowed claims to the greatest extent possible, even when potential interferences exist. This is due to the fact that applicants may be eligible for patent term adjustments to offset delays in examination. As stated in MPEP 2303.01: “Since applicants may be…

Read More

When should an application with interfering claims be issued if examination is completed?

According to MPEP 2303.01, an application with interfering claims should be issued promptly if its examination is completed and all claims are allowable, even if there is another pending application with potentially interfering claims that has not completed examination. The MPEP provides this example: “Two applications, C and D, which are both subject to pre-AIA…

Read More

How are tie situations handled when two applications with interfering claims are ready to issue?

In the rare situation where two applications with interfering claims are both ready to issue simultaneously, the USPTO follows specific guidelines as outlined in MPEP 2303.01: “Two applications, E and F, which are both subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(g), with interfering claims are pending. Both are ready to issue. (Such ties should be extremely…

Read More