What are the requirements for suggesting an interference?

According to MPEP 2304.02(b), when suggesting an interference, an applicant must meet several requirements as outlined in 37 CFR 41.202. These include: Identifying all claims believed to interfere Proposing one or more counts Showing how the claims correspond to the count(s) Providing a claim chart comparing at least one claim of each party for each…

Read More

What is the purpose of the “No Second Interference” rule in patent law?

The “No Second Interference” rule in patent law serves several important purposes: Preventing redundant proceedings Ensuring efficiency in the patent examination process Providing finality to interference decisions Conserving USPTO resources As stated in MPEP 2308.03(c): “No second interference should occur between the same parties on patentably indistinct subject matter.” This rule helps maintain the integrity…

Read More

What is procedural estoppel in patent interference proceedings?

Procedural estoppel in patent interference proceedings prevents a losing party from seeking relief that could have been—but was not—sought during the interference. MPEP 2308.03 states: “A losing party is procedurally barred from seeking from the examiner relief that could have been–but was not–sought in the interference.” This means that if an applicant had the opportunity…

Read More

How are PCT application files handled in patent interferences?

The MPEP 2304.01(b) provides guidance on handling Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application files in interference proceedings: “Generally, a separate application file for a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application is not required for according benefit because the PCT application is included in a national stage application file that is itself either the application involved in the…

Read More

What is the process for a patentee to alert an examiner about potentially interfering claims?

According to MPEP 2304.03, a patentee can alert an examiner about potentially interfering claims in an application, but this process is limited: “A patentee may, however, to the limited extent permitted under 37 CFR 1.291, alert an examiner to the existence of interfering claims in an application.” The process involves: Submitting a protest under 37…

Read More