How should an examiner handle formal requirements in Office actions?
According to MPEP 707.07(a), examiners should handle formal requirements in Office actions as follows: Include any form that lists informalities and additional formal requirements in the first action. When indicating allowable subject matter, call attention to 37 CFR 1.111(b) and state that a complete reply must either comply with all formal requirements or specifically traverse…
Read MoreHow are foreign patent citation errors handled by the USPTO?
The USPTO has specific procedures for handling errors in foreign patent citations. According to MPEP 707.05(g): If a FOREIGN patent is incorrectly cited: for example, the wrong country is indicated or the country omitted from the citation, the General Reference Branch of the Scientific and Technical Library may be helpful. The date and number of…
Read MoreHow should examiners handle demonstrations during interviews?
How should examiners handle demonstrations during interviews? Examiners should handle demonstrations during interviews as follows: Approval: Obtain approval from the supervisor before allowing any demonstration. Documentation: Record the substance of the demonstration in the interview summary form or in an attachment. Safety: Ensure the demonstration is safe and does not pose any risks. Confidentiality: Respect…
Read MoreHow should examiners handle allowable subject matter in patent applications?
Examiners should proactively handle allowable subject matter in patent applications according to MPEP 707.07(j): For pro se applications, draft one or more claims for the applicant if patentable subject matter is disclosed but not properly claimed. When claims are allowable except for formal matters, offer constructive suggestions for correction. If some claims are clearly allowable,…
Read MoreWhat are the guidelines for submitting prior art to the USPTO?
The guidelines for submitting prior art to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are outlined in MPEP ยง 609. These guidelines are for applicants, their attorneys, and agents who wish to submit prior art for consideration. According to MPEP 707.05(b), “Submitted citations will not in any way diminish the obligation of examiners to conduct…
Read MoreHow should examiners handle the modification of Form Paragraphs?
Examiners are instructed to avoid modifying Form Paragraphs unnecessarily. The MPEP 707 states: “Examiners should no longer modify the language of form paragraphs by making minor changes to the wording. If the form paragraph does not require the specific change to the language being made by the examiner, a new form paragraph should be developed…
Read MoreWhat are the general guidelines for conducting interviews in patent applications?
The general guidelines for conducting interviews in patent applications are outlined in MPEP 713.01. Key points include: Interviews must be conducted on Office premises and within Office hours, as designated by examiners. Interviews for discussing patentability typically won’t occur before the first Office action, unless it’s a continuing or substitute application. Face-to-face interviews may be…
Read MoreWhat are the guidelines for demonstrating inventions during patent examiner interviews?
What are the guidelines for demonstrating inventions during patent examiner interviews? When demonstrating inventions during patent examiner interviews, applicants should follow these guidelines: Safety first: Ensure the demonstration is safe for all participants. Advance notice: Inform the examiner in advance about any special arrangements needed. Time management: Keep the demonstration brief and focused on relevant…
Read MoreCan patent examiners group claims together in a common rejection?
Patent examiners should be cautious when grouping claims together for rejection. According to MPEP 707.07(d): “Claims should not be grouped together in a common rejection unless that rejection is equally applicable to all claims in the group.” This guideline ensures that each claim receives proper individual consideration. Examiners should only group claims together if the…
Read MoreWhat are the grounds for petitioning a requirement under 37 CFR 1.105?
What are the grounds for petitioning a requirement under 37 CFR 1.105? Petitions to requirements under 37 CFR 1.105 can be filed on the following grounds: Relevance: The requirement is not relevant to the examination of the application. Proprietary information: The required information is trade secret, proprietary, or subject to a protective order. Undue burden:…
Read More