What happens if examiners disagree on a Patentability Report?

When examiners disagree on a Patentability Report, there are established procedures to resolve the conflict. According to MPEP 705.01(a): “If the primary examiner does not agree with the Patentability Report or any portion thereof, he or she may consult with the primary examiner responsible for the report. If agreement as to the resulting action cannot…

Read More

What are the requirements for making a second or subsequent action final in patent examination?

According to MPEP 706.07, a second or any subsequent action on the merits can be made final, except where the examiner introduces a new ground of rejection that is neither necessitated by applicant’s amendment of the claims nor based on information submitted in an information disclosure statement filed during the period set forth in 37…

Read More

Is a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105 considered an Office action for patent term adjustment purposes?

Yes, a requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105 is considered an Office action for patent term adjustment purposes. MPEP ยง 704.13 explicitly states: A requirement for information under 37 CFR 1.105 is an Office action under 35 U.S.C. 132 for patent term adjustment purposes. This means that the issuance of a requirement for information…

Read More