How does the “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule affect patent enablement?
How does the “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule affect patent enablement? The “Inoperative Subject Matter” rule plays a significant role in patent enablement. According to MPEP 2164.08: “Claims should be rejected as lacking enablement when the disclosure does not enable one skilled in the art to practice the claimed invention without undue experimentation. All questions of…
Read MoreWhy are biological deposits important in biotechnology patents?
Biological deposits are crucial in biotechnology patents because they ensure that the invention is fully disclosed and can be reproduced. MPEP 2401 introduces the rules for deposits of biological materials (37 CFR 1.801 – 1.809), which are essential when written description alone is insufficient to enable the invention. These deposits allow for: Preservation of unique…
Read MoreHow do “Critical Feature” claims affect patent enablement requirements?
How do “Critical Feature” claims affect patent enablement requirements? “Critical Feature” claims have a significant impact on patent enablement requirements. The MPEP 2164.08 provides guidance on this topic: “A claim that recites a critical feature of the invention that is not recited in the specification as filed is not enabled by the original disclosure.” This…
Read More