When is a Board decision considered final for judicial review?
According to MPEP 1213, a decision of the Board that includes a remand is not considered final for judicial review. The MPEP states: 37 CFR 41.50(e) provides that a decision of the Board which includes a remand will not be considered final for judicial review. The Board, following conclusion of the proceedings before the examiner,…
Read MoreWhat is the Pre-Appeal Brief Conference Pilot Program?
The Pre-Appeal Brief Conference Pilot Program is an initiative by the USPTO that allows applicants to request a review of the application prior to filing a full appeal brief. This program has specific rules regarding interviews: “As indicated in the notice “Pre-Appeal Brief Conference Pilot Program,” 1296 OG 76 (July 12, 2005), no interviews will…
Read MoreWhen are interviews permitted after a notice of appeal is filed?
After a notice of appeal is filed, interviews are generally permitted during the period from the mailing of the final rejection through the filing of an appeal brief. However, there are some important exceptions: No interviews are granted from the filing of a request for pre-appeal review through the issuance of a decision on that…
Read MoreCan relying on a new portion of a reference create a new ground of rejection?
Yes, relying on a new portion of a reference can create a new ground of rejection in patent appeals. The MPEP 1207.03(a) states: “Factual situations that have been found to constitute a new ground of rejection include… Citing new structure from a prior art reference to support an existing rejection.” This means that if an…
Read MoreHow does a new interpretation of claims affect grounds of rejection?
A new interpretation of claims can lead to a new ground of rejection in patent appeals. According to MPEP 1207.03(a): “Factual situations that have been found to constitute a new ground of rejection include… Changing the statutory basis of rejection from one section of the statute to another section… [or] Citing new structure from a…
Read MoreWhat constitutes a new ground of rejection in patent appeals?
A new ground of rejection in patent appeals occurs when the basic thrust of the rejection changes. According to MPEP 1207.03(a), this happens when: The examiner relies on new facts or rationales not previously raised to the applicant The rejection “changes the statutory basis of rejection from one section of the statute to another section”…
Read MoreCan new evidence be introduced in a 35 U.S.C. 145 action?
Yes, in an action under 35 U.S.C. 145, the plaintiff is allowed to introduce new evidence that was not previously presented to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). This is one of the key advantages of pursuing a civil action under 35 U.S.C. 145 instead of a direct appeal to the Federal Circuit. The…
Read MoreCan I submit new claims after filing an appeal brief?
While you can submit new claims after filing an appeal brief, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) is not obligated to consider them. According to MPEP 1211.02: “There is no obligation resting on the Board to consider new or amended claims submitted while it has jurisdiction of the appeal.” However, certain limited types…
Read MoreAre there any additional FAQs for MPEP 1211.03 – Remand To Consider Affidavits or Declarations?
No additional FAQs can be generated for this section. The existing FAQs have comprehensively covered the content of MPEP 1211.03, including the circumstances under which the Board may remand an application to the examiner, the purpose of such remands, and the procedures involved. The section is relatively brief and focused, and all key points have…
Read MoreHow does the mandate rule affect Federal Circuit appeals in patent cases?
The mandate rule plays a crucial role in Federal Circuit appeals for patent cases. It ensures that lower courts and administrative bodies, such as the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), comply with the appellate court’s decisions. Key aspects of the mandate rule include: Binding nature: Lower tribunals must adhere to the Federal Circuit’s mandate.…
Read More