How does the Pre-Appeal Brief Review process work?
The Pre-Appeal Brief Review process involves the following steps: Upon receipt of a properly filed request, a supervisor designates a panel of reviewers. The panel includes at least a supervisor and the examiner of record. The panel reviews the appellant’s remarks and the examiner’s rejections. The review is conducted without the appellant’s presence, and no…
Read MoreAre additional appeal fees required when responding to a Board remand?
No, additional appeal fees are not required when responding to a Board remand. The MPEP specifically states: “Responding to a requirement for briefing under 37 CFR 41.50(d) or responding to a remand under 37 CFR 41.50(e) would not require payment of additional appeal fees.” This means that when the Board remands a case or requires…
Read MoreWhat is required for new grounds of rejection in an examiner’s answer?
When an examiner’s answer contains a new ground of rejection, specific requirements must be met. According to MPEP 1207.01: “If the examiner’s answer contains a new ground of rejection, it must clearly designate the rejection as a new ground of rejection. 37 CFR 41.39 specifies that new grounds of rejection must be approved by the…
Read MoreWhat is the purpose of MPEP 1205 in the patent appeal process?
MPEP 1205 serves a crucial role in the patent appeal process by providing guidance on Appeal Briefs. The primary purposes of this section include: Outlining the requirements for Appeal Briefs as specified in 37 CFR 41.37 Explaining the content and structure expected in an Appeal Brief Providing instructions for both applicants and examiners on how…
Read MoreWhat fees are associated with filing a Notice of Appeal?
Filing a Notice of Appeal requires payment of specific fees as set by the USPTO. According to the MPEP, “The fees for appeal as set forth in 35 U.S.C. 41(a)(6) have been adjusted by rule at 37 CFR 41.20(b).” These fees include: Fee for filing a notice of appeal (37 CFR 41.20(b)(1)) Fee for filing…
Read MoreWhat options does an examiner have after considering an appeal brief?
According to MPEP 1207 and 37 CFR 41.39, after considering the issues raised in an appeal brief, an examiner has several options. The MPEP states: “After an appeal brief under 37 CFR 41.37 has been filed and the examiner has considered the issues on appeal, the examiner may:” While the specific options are not listed…
Read MoreWhat is the time frame for an examiner to provide an answer to an appeal brief?
According to the MPEP, an examiner should provide a written answer to an appeal brief within a specific timeframe: “The examiner should furnish the appellant with a written statement in answer to the appellant’s brief within 2 months after the receipt of the brief by the examiner.“ It’s important to note that while the regulation…
Read MoreHow is an appeal conference documented in the examiner’s answer?
The appeal conference must be documented in the examiner’s answer to ensure a clear record. The MPEP 1207.01 provides specific instructions: “On the examiner’s answer, below the primary examiner’s signature, the word “Conferees:” should be included, followed by the typed or printed names of the other two appeal conference participants. These two appeal conference participants…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of requesting a rehearing instead of filing an amendment in response to a new ground of rejection?
When an appellant chooses to request a rehearing under 37 CFR 41.50(b)(2) instead of filing an amendment or new evidence under 37 CFR 41.50(b)(1), there are significant consequences. The MPEP outlines these consequences: “By proceeding in this manner, the appellant waives their right to further prosecution before the examiner. In re Greenfield, 40 F.2d 775,…
Read MoreWhat happens if a Pre-Appeal Brief Request is not timely filed?
What happens if a Pre-Appeal Brief Request is not timely filed? If a Pre-Appeal Brief Request is not timely filed, it will not be considered. According to the MPEP, “The request must be filed with the Notice of Appeal, but no later than the expiration of the period for reply set forth in the last…
Read More