How does the Pre-Appeal Brief Review process work?

The Pre-Appeal Brief Review process involves the following steps: Upon receipt of a properly filed request, a supervisor designates a panel of reviewers. The panel includes at least a supervisor and the examiner of record. The panel reviews the appellant’s remarks and the examiner’s rejections. The review is conducted without the appellant’s presence, and no…

Read More

How is an appeal conference documented in the examiner’s answer?

The appeal conference must be documented in the examiner’s answer to ensure a clear record. The MPEP 1207.01 provides specific instructions: “On the examiner’s answer, below the primary examiner’s signature, the word “Conferees:” should be included, followed by the typed or printed names of the other two appeal conference participants. These two appeal conference participants…

Read More

What are the consequences of requesting a rehearing instead of filing an amendment in response to a new ground of rejection?

When an appellant chooses to request a rehearing under 37 CFR 41.50(b)(2) instead of filing an amendment or new evidence under 37 CFR 41.50(b)(1), there are significant consequences. The MPEP outlines these consequences: “By proceeding in this manner, the appellant waives their right to further prosecution before the examiner. In re Greenfield, 40 F.2d 775,…

Read More