What are intervening rights in inter partes reexamination?

Intervening rights in inter partes reexamination are legal protections granted to individuals or entities who have used or made substantial preparations to use a patented invention before the patent was amended or new claims were added during reexamination. These rights are outlined in 35 U.S.C. 316(b), which states: “Any proposed amended or new claim determined…

Read More

How are new and amended claims presented in an Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate?

The Inter Partes Reexamination Certificate has a specific format for presenting new and amended claims. According to MPEP 2690: “Any new claims will be printed in the certificate completely in italics, and any amended claims will be printed in the certificate with italics and bracketing indicating the amendments thereto.” This formatting allows readers to easily…

Read More

How does inherent disclosure affect patent applications?

Inherent disclosure in patent applications allows for later amendments that explicitly state functions, theories, or advantages that were inherently present in the original disclosure. The MPEP Section 2163.07(a) explains: “By disclosing in a patent application a device that inherently performs a function or has a property, operates according to a theory or has an advantage,…

Read More

Can informal amendments be accepted in inter partes reexamination proceedings?

No, informal amendments are not accepted in inter partes reexamination proceedings. The MPEP 2685 explicitly states: “An informal amendment by the patent owner will not be accepted, because that would be tantamount to an ex parte interview.” This policy ensures that all communications and amendments are formally submitted and properly recorded, maintaining the integrity and…

Read More

How are obvious errors in patent applications handled?

Amendments to correct obvious errors in patent applications do not constitute new matter under certain conditions. The MPEP Section 2163.07 provides guidance: “An amendment to correct an obvious error does not constitute new matter where one skilled in the art would not only recognize the existence of error in the specification, but also the appropriate…

Read More

How does the examiner handle proposed amendments during reexamination?

During reexamination, the examiner follows specific guidelines when considering proposed amendments to the specification, including claims, made by the patent owner. According to MPEP 2253: “With respect to consideration of any proposed amendments to the specification, including claims, made by the patent owner, the examiner will be guided by the provisions of 37 CFR 1.530(d)-(j).“…

Read More