How does express abandonment affect continuation applications?
How does express abandonment affect continuation applications? Express abandonment of a parent application can have significant implications for continuation applications. According to MPEP 711.01: ‘Applicants and their attorneys should be careful not to expressly abandon applications that are the parents of continuation applications where the parent application is to be abandoned in favor of the…
Read MoreWhat happens to pending claims in a continuation application if the parent application is abandoned?
What happens to pending claims in a continuation application if the parent application is abandoned? The abandonment of a parent application does not necessarily affect the pending claims in a continuation application. According to MPEP 711.02(b): “The abandonment of a parent application does not affect the status of a continuation application or a continuation-in-part application…
Read MoreWhat happens to cited references in continuation applications?
For continuation applications, the treatment of cited references differs from new applications. According to MPEP 707.05(a): Additionally, copies of references cited in continuation applications if they had been previously cited in the parent application are not furnished. However, if no new art is cited in the continuation application, the MPEP states: In the rare instance…
Read MoreCan an examiner reject a claim that was allowed in a parent application?
Yes, an examiner can reject a claim that was allowed in a parent application. The MPEP 706.04 states: “Where the examiner determines that a claim that was previously allowed is unpatentable, the claim may be rejected in the next Office action, whether that action is a first or subsequent action on a continuation or divisional…
Read MoreWhat happens if a continuation-in-part application includes new matter not disclosed in the parent application?
When a continuation-in-part (CIP) application includes new matter not disclosed in the parent application, the following consequences apply: Claims solely directed to subject matter adequately disclosed in the parent application are entitled to the parent application’s filing date. Claims that include new matter introduced in the CIP are only entitled to the filing date of…
Read MoreWhat is the filing date of a divisional application?
What is the filing date of a divisional application? A divisional application is entitled to the filing date of the parent application. According to MPEP 201.06, “A divisional application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the prior-filed application if filed as a nonprovisional application that discloses and claims only subject matter…
Read MoreWhat is the relationship between a divisional application and its parent application?
What is the relationship between a divisional application and its parent application? A divisional application is closely related to its parent application, as it stems from the same invention disclosure. According to MPEP 201.06, “A divisional application is a later application for an independent or distinct invention, carved out of a pending application and disclosing…
Read MoreCan I file a divisional-continuation application after my parent application has been patented?
Can I file a divisional-continuation application after my parent application has been patented? No, you cannot file a divisional-continuation application after your parent application has been patented. According to MPEP 201.06(c): “The divisional application must be filed before the patenting or abandonment of or termination of proceedings on the prior application.” This means that the…
Read MoreHow does filing a continuation-in-part affect outstanding rejections in the parent application?
Filing a continuation-in-part (CIP) application does not automatically resolve or affect outstanding rejections in the parent application. The MPEP 201.08 clarifies this point: “The mere filing of a continuation-in-part application does not itself create a presumption that the applicant acquiesces in any rejections which may be outstanding in the copending national nonprovisional application or applications…
Read MoreWhat is the relationship between a continuation-in-part application and its parent application?
What is the relationship between a continuation-in-part application and its parent application? A continuation-in-part (CIP) application is a type of patent application that has a unique relationship with its parent application. According to MPEP 201.08: “A continuation-in-part is an application filed during the lifetime of an earlier nonprovisional application, repeating some substantial portion or all…
Read More