How does the USPTO handle prior art references with both operable and inoperable features?

How does the USPTO handle prior art references with both operable and inoperable features? The USPTO has a specific approach to handling prior art references that contain both operable and inoperable features. According to MPEP 716.07: “Where the affidavit or declaration presented asserts inoperability in features of the reference which are not relied upon, the…

Read More

What is the significance of enablement in prior art references?

What is the significance of enablement in prior art references? Enablement is a crucial concept in evaluating prior art references during patent examination. The MPEP 716.07 provides important guidance on this matter: “The operability and utility of the prior art is presumed. However, once substantial evidence is presented rebutting this presumption, the examiner should reconsider…

Read More

What is the presumption of operability in patent law?

The presumption of operability is a legal concept in patent law that assumes every patent is valid and operable. This is based on 35 U.S.C. 282, which states that patents are presumed valid. The MPEP section 716.07 elaborates on this, stating: ‘Since every patent is presumed valid (35 U.S.C. 282), and since that presumption includes…

Read More

What is the role of affidavits in challenging the operability of a prior art reference?

What is the role of affidavits in challenging the operability of a prior art reference? Affidavits can play a crucial role in challenging the operability of a prior art reference. According to MPEP 716.07, “Where the affidavit or declaration presented asserts inoperability in features of the reference which are not relied upon, the reference is…

Read More