What is the test for obviousness in patent law?

The test for obviousness is based on what the combined teachings of prior art references would have suggested to a person of ordinary skill in the art. According to MPEP 2143.01, “Obviousness can be established by combining or modifying the teachings of the prior art to produce the claimed invention where there is some teaching,…

Read More

Can a prior art disclosure be used in an obviousness rejection if it doesn’t meet the anticipation requirements?

Yes, a prior art disclosure can be used in an obviousness rejection even if it doesn’t meet the anticipation requirements. The MPEP clarifies: “The description requirement of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and (a)(2) does not preclude an examiner from applying a disclosure in an obviousness rejection under AIA 35 U.S.C. 103 simply because the disclosure…

Read More

What is the “obvious to try” rationale in patent law?

The “obvious to try” rationale is a valid basis for an obviousness rejection in patent law, as clarified by the Supreme Court in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. According to MPEP 2144.05: “The Supreme Court has clarified that an ‘obvious to try’ line of reasoning may properly support an obviousness rejection. … [W]hen there…

Read More

How does MPEP treat optimization of ranges through routine experimentation?

How does MPEP treat optimization of ranges through routine experimentation? The MPEP addresses the optimization of ranges through routine experimentation in section 2144.05. According to this guidance: “[W]here the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the optimum or workable ranges by routine experimentation.” This…

Read More

How does MPEP address the obviousness of similar proportions or amounts?

How does MPEP address the obviousness of similar proportions or amounts? The MPEP addresses the obviousness of similar proportions or amounts in section 2144.05. According to this guidance: “Generally, differences in concentration or temperature will not support the patentability of subject matter encompassed by the prior art unless there is evidence indicating such concentration or…

Read More