How are rejections under both pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 formulated?
In certain situations, an examiner may need to make a rejection under both pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103. Form paragraph 7.27.fti is provided for this purpose: Claim(s) [1] is/are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 ([2]) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as obvious over [3]. However, the…
Read MoreWhat is the burden of proof in rebutting a prima facie case of obviousness?
According to MPEP 2145, if a prima facie case of obviousness is established, the burden shifts to the applicant to come forward with arguments and/or evidence to rebut the prima facie case. As stated in the MPEP: “If a prima facie case of obviousness is established, the burden shifts to the applicant to come forward…
Read MoreHow can an applicant rebut a prima facie case of obviousness for overlapping ranges?
An applicant can rebut a prima facie case of obviousness for overlapping ranges in several ways, as outlined in MPEP 2144.05: Showing criticality of the range: The applicant must demonstrate that the claimed range is critical, generally by showing unexpected results relative to the prior art range. Teaching away: The applicant can show that the…
Read MoreHow does the reasonable expectation of success requirement apply in unpredictable arts?
The reasonable expectation of success requirement applies to all fields of invention, but it can be more challenging to establish in unpredictable arts, such as biotechnology or pharmaceuticals. In these fields, the level of predictability is generally lower, which can affect the analysis of obviousness. The MPEP 2143.02 provides guidance on this issue, citing relevant…
Read MoreWhat role does “reasonable expectation of success” play in obviousness rejections?
What role does “reasonable expectation of success” play in obviousness rejections? The concept of “reasonable expectation of success” is a crucial element in determining obviousness in patent examination. According to MPEP 2143.02: “Obviousness does not require absolute predictability, however, at least some degree of predictability is required.” This means that when an examiner combines or…
Read MoreWhat is the role of “reasonable expectation of success” in obviousness determinations?
The “reasonable expectation of success” plays a crucial role in obviousness determinations under patent law. According to MPEP 2143.02, “Obviousness does not require absolute predictability, however, at least some degree of predictability is required.” This means that for an invention to be considered obvious, there must be a reasonable probability that the proposed modification or…
Read MoreWhat is the “reasonable expectation of success” requirement in patent law?
The “reasonable expectation of success” requirement is a crucial element in determining obviousness in patent law. According to MPEP 2143.02, “Where there is a reason to modify or combine the prior art to achieve the claimed invention, the claims may be rejected as prima facie obvious provided there is also a reasonable expectation of success.”…
Read MoreWhat is the “rationale to support a conclusion of obviousness” in patent examination?
The “rationale to support a conclusion of obviousness” in patent examination refers to the reasoning an examiner must provide when rejecting a claim as obvious. According to MPEP 2142: “[T]he examiner bears the initial burden of factually supporting any prima facie conclusion of obviousness. If the examiner does not produce a prima facie case, the…
Read MoreHow does the purification of an old product impact its patentability?
The purification of an old product can impact its patentability, but mere purity alone is not always sufficient to render a product nonobvious. According to MPEP 2144.04, “Pure materials are novel vis-à-vis less pure or impure materials because there is a difference between pure and impure materials. Therefore, the issue is whether claims to a…
Read MoreWhat is the relationship between prior art teachings and reasonable expectation of success?
The relationship between prior art teachings and reasonable expectation of success is crucial in patent examination. According to MPEP 2143.02, the teachings of the prior art and their specificity play a significant role in determining whether there is a reasonable expectation of success in combining or modifying references. The MPEP provides guidance on this relationship:…
Read More