What happens if the examiner determines that a continuation or divisional application contains new matter?

If an examiner determines that a continuation or divisional application contains new matter relative to the prior application, the following steps will occur: The examiner will notify the applicant in the next Office action. The examiner will indicate that the application should be redesignated as a continuation-in-part (CIP). According to MPEP 602.05: If the examiner…

Read More

How does the USPTO handle new matter introduced in continuation-in-part applications?

How does the USPTO handle new matter introduced in continuation-in-part applications? Continuation-in-part (CIP) applications are a special case when it comes to new matter. The MPEP 608.04 states: ‘In the case of a continuation-in-part application, any claim directed to matter which was not described in the parent nonprovisional application in the manner provided by the…

Read More

Can new matter be added in a CPA?

No, new matter cannot be added in a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA). The MPEP clearly states: No amendment in an application under this paragraph (a continued prosecution application) may introduce new matter or matter that would have been new matter in the prior application. Any attempt to add new matter will be denied entry by…

Read More

Can new matter be added to a divisional application?

No, new matter cannot be added to a divisional application. The divisional application must only contain subject matter disclosed in the parent application. The MPEP clearly states: Thus the disclosure presented in a divisional application must not include any subject matter which would constitute new matter if submitted as an amendment to the parent application.…

Read More

What is the difference between new matter and inherent disclosure in patent applications?

What is the difference between new matter and inherent disclosure in patent applications? New matter and inherent disclosure are distinct concepts in patent law: New matter refers to information added to a patent application after its filing date that goes beyond the original disclosure. This is generally not allowed and can result in rejection. Inherent…

Read More