How are amendments handled in inter partes reexamination proceedings?
Amendments in inter partes reexamination proceedings are handled as follows: Amendments should be submitted in proper form If appropriate, amendments will be entered for the reexamination proceeding, even if they don’t have legal effect until the certificate is issued “New matter” amendments to the disclosure will be required to be canceled Claims containing new matter…
Read MoreWhat are the requirements for amendments in ex parte reexamination?
What are the requirements for amendments in ex parte reexamination? In ex parte reexamination, amendments must meet specific requirements as outlined in MPEP 2250: Amendments must be made relative to the patent specification and claims as they exist at the time of the reexamination order. All amendments must be made without adding new matter. Amendments…
Read MoreCan dictionary definitions be added to a patent application without being considered new matter?
Generally, adding dictionary or art-recognized definitions known at the time of filing an application may not be considered new matter. However, there are important considerations. The MPEP Section 2163.07 states: “The mere inclusion of dictionary or art recognized definitions known at the time of filing an application may not be considered new matter. If there…
Read MoreHow do I declare that a sequence listing amendment contains no new matter?
When submitting an amendment that adds a sequence listing to a patent application, it’s crucial to declare that the amendment contains no new matter. The MPEP provides a sample statement for this purpose: “I hereby state that the amendment adding a ‘Sequence Listing’, made in accordance with 37 CFR 1.825(a) is supported in the application,…
Read MoreCan corrections be made to sequence listings after filing?
Corrections to sequence listings are subject to strict rules regarding the introduction of new matter. According to MPEP 2422.07: “The correction of errors in sequencing or any other errors that are made in describing an invention are subject to the statutory prohibition (35 U.S.C. 132 and 35 U.S.C. 251) against the introduction of new matter.”…
Read MoreWhat is the impact of continuation-in-part applications on effective filing dates?
Continuation-in-part (CIP) applications can have a significant impact on effective filing dates. According to MPEP 2154.01(b): The AIA draws a distinction between actually filed and effectively filed dates. The “effectively filed” date of a subject matter described in a U.S. patent document is the earlier of: (1) The actual filing date of the patent or…
Read MoreWhat happens if the best mode is not disclosed in the original patent application?
If the best mode contemplated by the inventor at the time of filing is not disclosed in the original patent application, this defect cannot be cured by later amendments. The MPEP 2165.01 states: “If the best mode contemplated by the inventor at the time of filing the application is not disclosed, such a defect cannot…
Read MoreWhat are the consequences of not making a biological deposit before filing a patent application?
Not making a biological deposit before filing a patent application can have serious consequences: The application may be rejected for lack of enablement under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112. If the deposit is made after the filing date, it may not be considered part of the original disclosure,…
Read MoreCan amending a claim lead to a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)?
Yes, amending a claim to include an invention not described in the original application can lead to a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112(a). The MPEP 2174 states: “If a claim is amended to include an invention that is not described in the application as filed, a rejection of that claim under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or…
Read MoreCan a deposit be made after the filing date of a patent application?
Yes, a deposit can be made after the filing date of a patent application, but there are specific requirements and potential consequences to consider. According to MPEP 2411.01: “A deposit made after the date of filing may be acceptable if it meets the requirements of 37 CFR 1.804(b) and if applicant submits a statement in…
Read More